From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: mbuf changes Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:24:19 +0200 Message-ID: <2277634.HujMj1Cctl@xps13> References: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC359EA8B1@smartserver.smartshare.dk> <39b70924-0e66-478c-36ea-dd18d27ed8a6@6wind.com> <5wj6euqlvai26vmpn4dcfe4p.1477400683290@email.android.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Olivier Matz , Morten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=F8rup?= , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , "Richardson, Bruce" , "Wiles, Keith" To: "Ramia, Kannan Babu" Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A772E41 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:24:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id d128so27379210wmf.1 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 06:24:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5wj6euqlvai26vmpn4dcfe4p.1477400683290@email.android.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-10-25 13:04, Ramia, Kannan Babu: > Port filed is important meta information for the application use like > CGNAT vEPC functions etc. > I strongly recommend to keep the field in mind meta. Have you tried to move this field outside of the mbuf? What is the performance degradation? We need more information than some assumptions.