On 05/31/2017 02:12 AM, Denis Kenzior wrote:
> It is quite obvious the driver implementation is wrong.  Someone was a 
> bit too copy-paste happy.  When this driver was submitted, the query API 
> was not being exercised, hence this path was never tested.
> 
> I do not know/have the ISI specs, nor do I have any functional ISI 
> hardware.  In effect, the ISI driver code is not maintained.  If you 
> want to fix this, then you will need to figure out what the callback 
> implementation should look like.  Perhaps this RFC version of the 
> current driver code might be of use, see sec_code_state_resp_cb() in 
> particular:
> https://lists.ofono.org/pipermail/ofono/2010-October/005154.html
> 
> Regards,
> -Denis

I'm not inclined to find out what any of this is, so it'll just stay broken.