From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:34:19 -0600 Message-ID: <22A6238E-0BA4-4AB9-A4FA-28B206A47513@oracle.com> References: <20100621231809.GA11111%ca-server1.us.oracle.com4C49468B.40307@vflare.org> <840b32ff-a303-468e-9d4e-30fc92f629f8@default> <20100723140440.GA12423@infradead.org> <364c83bd-ccb2-48cc-920d-ffcf9ca7df19@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Boaz Harrosh , Christoph Hellwig , ngupta@vflare.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Chris Mason , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, adilger@sun.com, tytso@mit.edu, mfasheh@suse.com, Joel Becker , matthew@wil.cx, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, jeremy@goop.org, JBeulich@novell.com, Kurt Hackel , npiggin@suse.de, Dave Mccracken , riel@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com, Konrad Wilk To: Dan Magenheimer Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-ID: On 2010-08-03, at 11:35, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > - The FS should be block-device-based (e.g. a ram-based FS > such as tmpfs should not enable cleancache) When you say "block device based", does this exclude network = filesystems? It would seem cleancache, like fscache, is actually best = suited to high-latency network filesystems. > - To ensure coherency/correctness, inode numbers must be unique > (e.g. no emulating 64-bit inode space on 32-bit inode numbers) Does it need to be restricted to inode numbers at all (i.e. can it use = an opaque internal identifier like the NFS file handle)? Disallowing = cleancache on a filesystem that uses 64-bit (or larger) inodes on a = 32-bit system reduces its usefulness. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Lustre Technical Lead Oracle Corporation Canada Inc. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757157Ab0HCSgt (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2010 14:36:49 -0400 Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:64764 "EHLO rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756656Ab0HCSgr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2010 14:36:47 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Andreas Dilger X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:34:19 -0600 Cc: Boaz Harrosh , Christoph Hellwig , ngupta@vflare.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Chris Mason , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, adilger@sun.com, tytso@mit.edu, mfasheh@suse.com, Joel Becker , matthew@wil.cx, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, jeremy@goop.org, JBeulich@novell.com, Kurt Hackel , npiggin@suse.de, Dave Mccracken , riel@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com, Konrad Wilk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <22A6238E-0BA4-4AB9-A4FA-28B206A47513@oracle.com> References: <20100621231809.GA11111%ca-server1.us.oracle.com4C49468B.40307@vflare.org> <840b32ff-a303-468e-9d4e-30fc92f629f8@default> <20100723140440.GA12423@infradead.org> <364c83bd-ccb2-48cc-920d-ffcf9ca7df19@default> To: Dan Magenheimer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Source-IP: acsmt353.oracle.com [141.146.40.153] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090201.4C58617F.00FB:SCFMA4539814,ss=1,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2010-08-03, at 11:35, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > - The FS should be block-device-based (e.g. a ram-based FS > such as tmpfs should not enable cleancache) When you say "block device based", does this exclude network filesystems? It would seem cleancache, like fscache, is actually best suited to high-latency network filesystems. > - To ensure coherency/correctness, inode numbers must be unique > (e.g. no emulating 64-bit inode space on 32-bit inode numbers) Does it need to be restricted to inode numbers at all (i.e. can it use an opaque internal identifier like the NFS file handle)? Disallowing cleancache on a filesystem that uses 64-bit (or larger) inodes on a 32-bit system reduces its usefulness. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Lustre Technical Lead Oracle Corporation Canada Inc. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:34:19 -0600 Message-ID: <22A6238E-0BA4-4AB9-A4FA-28B206A47513@oracle.com> References: <20100621231809.GA11111%ca-server1.us.oracle.com4C49468B.40307@vflare.org> <840b32ff-a303-468e-9d4e-30fc92f629f8@default> <20100723140440.GA12423@infradead.org> <364c83bd-ccb2-48cc-920d-ffcf9ca7df19@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Boaz Harrosh , Christoph Hellwig , ngupta@vflare.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Chris Mason , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, adilger@sun.com, tytso@mit.edu, mfasheh@suse.com, Joel Becker , matthew@wil.cx, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, jeremy@goop.org, JBeulich@novell.com, Kurt Hackel , npiggin@suse.de, Dave Mccracken , riel@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com, Konrad Wilk To: Dan Magenheimer Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 2010-08-03, at 11:35, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > - The FS should be block-device-based (e.g. a ram-based FS > such as tmpfs should not enable cleancache) When you say "block device based", does this exclude network = filesystems? It would seem cleancache, like fscache, is actually best = suited to high-latency network filesystems. > - To ensure coherency/correctness, inode numbers must be unique > (e.g. no emulating 64-bit inode space on 32-bit inode numbers) Does it need to be restricted to inode numbers at all (i.e. can it use = an opaque internal identifier like the NFS file handle)? Disallowing = cleancache on a filesystem that uses 64-bit (or larger) inodes on a = 32-bit system reduces its usefulness. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Lustre Technical Lead Oracle Corporation Canada Inc. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Dilger Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:34:19 -0600 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview In-Reply-To: References: <20100621231809.GA11111%ca-server1.us.oracle.com4C49468B.40307@vflare.org> <840b32ff-a303-468e-9d4e-30fc92f629f8@default> <20100723140440.GA12423@infradead.org> <364c83bd-ccb2-48cc-920d-ffcf9ca7df19@default> Message-ID: <22A6238E-0BA4-4AB9-A4FA-28B206A47513@oracle.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Dan Magenheimer Cc: Boaz Harrosh , Christoph Hellwig , ngupta@vflare.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Chris Mason , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, adilger@sun.com, tytso@mit.edu, mfasheh@suse.com, Joel Becker , matthew@wil.cx, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, jeremy@goop.org, JBeulich@novell.com, Kurt Hackel , npiggin@suse.de, Dave Mccracken , riel@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com, Konrad Wilk On 2010-08-03, at 11:35, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > - The FS should be block-device-based (e.g. a ram-based FS > such as tmpfs should not enable cleancache) When you say "block device based", does this exclude network filesystems? It would seem cleancache, like fscache, is actually best suited to high-latency network filesystems. > - To ensure coherency/correctness, inode numbers must be unique > (e.g. no emulating 64-bit inode space on 32-bit inode numbers) Does it need to be restricted to inode numbers at all (i.e. can it use an opaque internal identifier like the NFS file handle)? Disallowing cleancache on a filesystem that uses 64-bit (or larger) inodes on a 32-bit system reduces its usefulness. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Lustre Technical Lead Oracle Corporation Canada Inc.