From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/16] net/axgbe: add interrupt handler for autonegotiation Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:06:15 -0800 Message-ID: <22ae1f40-1498-f87e-0371-f35b048e59af@intel.com> References: <1512047472-118050-1-git-send-email-Ravi1.kumar@amd.com> <1512047472-118050-7-git-send-email-Ravi1.kumar@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: Ravi Kumar , dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27DEE5D for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 22:06:16 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1512047472-118050-7-git-send-email-Ravi1.kumar@amd.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 11/30/2017 5:11 AM, Ravi Kumar wrote: > Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar <...> > +static void > +axgbe_dev_interrupt_handler(void *param) > +{ > + struct rte_eth_dev *dev = (struct rte_eth_dev *)param; > + struct axgbe_port *pdata = dev->data->dev_private; > + > + pdata->phy_if.an_isr(pdata); > + > + rte_intr_enable(&pdata->pci_dev->intr_handle); This is already inside the interrupt handler, shouldn't interrupts needs to be enabled somewhere else to reach this point at first place. And I have seen a few drivers does the same but do we need to call rte_intr_enable() in interrupt handler? Will interrupts disabled after each fire? <...>