From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luca Boccassi Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] eal: eal stub to add windows support Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2019 15:19:27 +0000 Message-ID: <22cc9e2b335b7363d873b051eda71f0812184f0d.camel@debian.org> References: <20190301071847.13376-1-anand.rawat@intel.com> <20190301071847.13376-2-anand.rawat@intel.com> <1633455.prhy9BIAj0@xps> <20190301141717.GA325020@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Anand Rawat , dev@dpdk.org, pallavi.kadam@intel.com, jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com, ranjit.menon@intel.com To: Bruce Richardson , Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com (mail-wm1-f68.google.com [209.85.128.68]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36822BB5 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2019 16:19:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id z84so12587661wmg.4 for ; Fri, 01 Mar 2019 07:19:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20190301141717.GA325020@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, 2019-03-01 at 14:17 +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 03:03:02PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 01/03/2019 08:18, Anand Rawat: > > >=20 > > [...] > > > @@ -17,13 +17,19 @@ elif host_machine.system() =3D=3D 'freebsd' > > > dpdk_conf.set('RTE_EXEC_ENV_BSDAPP', 1) subdir('bsdapp/eal') > > > =20 > > > +elif host_machine.system() =3D=3D 'windows' + > > > dpdk_conf.set('RTE_EXEC_ENV_WINDOWS', 1) > >=20 > > For consistency, it should RTE_EXEC_ENV_WINAPP. > >=20 > For this one you can partially blame me - early internal review > suggested > changing to winapp, but I suggested holding off on the change for > community > consensus. Personally, I would prefer a little inconsistency and > keep it > as windows for clarity. In future, I also think we should just rename > linxuapp to linux, and bsdapp to freebsd! >=20 > However, for now, if the majority prefer winapp, I'm ok with it. > [Though I > can't help reading it as winamp half the time! No llamas involved > here > though!] >=20 > /Bruce We already have many utility libs and tools in DPDK, surely it's fine to add userspace-accelerated MP3 playback too! --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi