From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nathan Cutler Subject: Re: hammer 0.94.10 QE status Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 09:19:11 +0100 Message-ID: <23126e7c-8064-9fa4-961d-faec8c513166@suse.cz> References: <90f9fb1d-74fa-3ae0-e5b7-186e5d1b2638@suse.cz> <22868a53-b99e-0686-e7e1-a288558aed27@suse.cz> <473edf7d-c46a-be4c-bc8a-35be4c095b2b@suse.cz> <9c713c1b-b01b-ed10-dc06-6ffc5e9f0aa6@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51450 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750825AbdBRIT6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Feb 2017 03:19:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Gregory Farnum Cc: Yuri Weinstein , Orit Wasserman , Sage Weil , Tamilarasi Muthamizhan , Ilya Dryomov , "Durgin, Josh" , "Just, Samuel" , "Dillaman, Jason" , John Spray , "Sadeh-Weinraub, Yehuda" , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" >> If someone reports problems upgrading their firefly cluster to hammer, and >> the problem is in firefly, will we publish a new firefly release? >> >> If someone reports problems upgrading their dumpling cluster to firefly, and >> the problem is in dumpling, will we publish a new dumpling release? > > Probably not. But, we do know that upgrades work now and so any new > failures must be a failure of the new version of Hammer. That, we > would hopefully avoid releasing, and would definitely issue a fix > release for. :) We can't strand users! Several people have looked at the upgrade/firefly-x (hammer) failures and nobody has found anything that wasn't an issue with the tests themselves. Maybe you could take a look, too? http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2017-01-30_20:52:09-upgrade:firefly-x-hammer-distro-basic-vps/ Note that this QE run was done against the old gitbuilder build system. Yuri has some special technique for achieving that ;-) This is because the old builds that are needed to run the tests were/are missing in the new build system. Injecting the old gitbuilder builds into the new system is apparently possible, but a manual hit-or-miss process. See http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18089 (David Galloway has been _very_ helpful there, but the issues persist.) This issue is affecting the jewel rados suite, even, since that suite includes a couple tests that install various dumpling and firefly releases and then upgrade them. Thanks, Nathan