From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FC5C433E1 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF0C206F4 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=samsung.com header.i=@samsung.com header.b="Nh6bhDXl" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729390AbgGMK2H (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 06:28:07 -0400 Received: from mailout4.samsung.com ([203.254.224.34]:26156 "EHLO mailout4.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727035AbgGMK2F (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 06:28:05 -0400 Received: from epcas1p3.samsung.com (unknown [182.195.41.47]) by mailout4.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTP id 20200713102801epoutp04a297a82181827a5b28e9e381e750cec7~hSRFagcBz2407524075epoutp04V for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:28:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailout4.samsung.com 20200713102801epoutp04a297a82181827a5b28e9e381e750cec7~hSRFagcBz2407524075epoutp04V DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samsung.com; s=mail20170921; t=1594636081; bh=wr0TSnSOYDrnW0OXmJJItmyosy7uPnji9OSa71BR9MQ=; h=Subject:Reply-To:From:To:CC:In-Reply-To:Date:References:From; b=Nh6bhDXlPywZVIXnBTnzFcxuxU7cGtUmpMYSTWXpGa5eFEUpxA7U0YDv7VixOhZEP KibD8Y8HNDexrl2p3fXKkfBS9jXXsNWd5HBfLUYR+QAuO+0dKzGYrB60dUkPVbZ5mA yzp+dgAqq62cZzuk/Qqp/uN+dk/0exm9TKxkzmO4= Received: from epcpadp2 (unknown [182.195.40.12]) by epcas1p1.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTP id 20200713102801epcas1p1c32b511ae839b91532ad5e29c8eb2277~hSRFChy_V1773917739epcas1p1I; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:28:01 +0000 (GMT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support Reply-To: daejun7.park@samsung.com From: Daejun Park To: Bean Huo , Daejun Park , Bart Van Assche , Avri Altman , "jejb@linux.ibm.com" , "martin.petersen@oracle.com" , "asutoshd@codeaurora.org" , "beanhuo@micron.com" , "stanley.chu@mediatek.com" , "cang@codeaurora.org" , "tomas.winkler@intel.com" CC: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , ALIM AKHTAR , Sang-yoon Oh , Sung-Jun Park , yongmyung lee , Jinyoung CHOI , Adel Choi , BoRam Shin X-Priority: 3 X-Content-Kind-Code: NORMAL In-Reply-To: <65b3b5bb56d2be8e365aae2163227aac7a71e600.camel@gmail.com> X-CPGS-Detection: blocking_info_exchange X-Drm-Type: N,general X-Msg-Generator: Mail X-Msg-Type: PERSONAL X-Reply-Demand: N Message-ID: <231786897.01594636081523.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 19:25:20 +0900 X-CMS-MailID: 20200713102520epcms2p5834b14ea70637529588802a11cabe94c Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Sendblock-Type: AUTO_CONFIDENTIAL X-CPGSPASS: Y X-CPGSPASS: Y X-Hop-Count: 3 X-CMS-RootMailID: 20200702231936epcms2p81557f83504ef1c1e81bfc81a0143a5b4 References: <65b3b5bb56d2be8e365aae2163227aac7a71e600.camel@gmail.com> <91dcecde-dd0d-c930-7c45-56ba144e748c@acm.org> <963815509.21593732182531.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2> <231786897.01594251001808.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp1> <336371513.41594280882718.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2> <963815509.21594603681971.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Bean > > Hi Bart, > > > > > > Bart - how do you want to proceed? > > > > > > Hi Avri and Daejun, > > > > > > As far as I can see none of the five patches have Reviewed-by tags > > > yet. I > > > think that Martin expects formal reviews for this patch series from > > > one or > > > more reviewers who are not colleagues of the author of this patch > > > series. > > > > > > Note: recently I have been more busy than usual, hence the delayed > > > reply. > > > > Thank you for replying to the email even though you are busy. > > > > Arvi, Bean - if patches looks ok, can this series have your reviewed- > > by tag? > > > > Thanks, > > Daejun > > Hi Daejun > > > I only can give my tested-by tag since I preliminary tested it and it > works. However, as I said in the previous email, there is performance > downgrade comparing to the direct submission approach, also, we should > think about HPB 2.0. I plan to add your direct submission approach with HPB 2.0. > Anyway, if Avri wants firstly make this series patch mainlined, > performance fixup later, this is fine to me. I can add and fix it > later. > > BTW, you should rebase your this series set patch since there are > conflicts with latest Martin' git repo, after that, you can add my > tested-by tag. > OK, I will. Thanks! > Tested-by: Bean Huo > > > Thanks, > Bean > Thanks, Daejun