From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] ethdev: fix port id storage Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 23:19:06 +0100 Message-ID: <2341214.iScQkZ5rM7@xps> References: <20180109162317.18183-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <20180117215802.90809-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <3175063.1rsM1vLuis@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, declan.doherty@intel.com, Boris Pismenny , Aviad Yehezkel , Radu Nicolau To: Ferruh Yigit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3175063.1rsM1vLuis@xps> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 17/01/2018 23:09, Thomas Monjalon: > 17/01/2018 22:57, Ferruh Yigit: > > port_id is now 16bits, update function parameter according. > > > > Fixes: 4c270218aa26 ("ethdev: support security APIs") > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Cc: declan.doherty@intel.com > > > > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit > > Acked-by: Hemant Agrawal > > Obviously, > Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon Not so obvious actually. It is a good fix, but an API change. This function was not declared experimental. It must wait 18.05. And the function has no doxygen! And the function was placed randomly in the middle of struct declarations! One more proof of the poor quality of rte_security stuff.