From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9437AC2D0A3 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 16:57:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571BE20809 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 16:57:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730558AbgKIQ5I (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2020 11:57:08 -0500 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.pl ([79.96.170.134]:46558 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731027AbgKIQ5G (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2020 11:57:06 -0500 Received: from 89-64-87-89.dynamic.chello.pl (89.64.87.89) (HELO kreacher.localnet) by serwer1319399.home.pl (79.96.170.134) with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer 0.83.520) id b729a6806886ddaf; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:57:03 +0100 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linux PM Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Srinivas Pandruvada , Zhang Rui , LKML , Doug Smythies Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Take CPUFREQ_GOV_FLAG_STRICT_TARGET into account Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 17:55:42 +0100 Message-ID: <2345253.LYi3vV7ftd@kreacher> In-Reply-To: <13269660.K2JYd4sGFX@kreacher> References: <13269660.K2JYd4sGFX@kreacher> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Rafael J. Wysocki Make intel_pstate take the new CPUFREQ_GOV_FLAG_STRICT_TARGET governor flag into account when it operates in the passive mode with HWP enabled, so as to fix the "powersave" governor behavior in that case (currently, HWP is allowed to scale the performance all the way up to the policy max limit when the "powersave" governor is used, but it should be constrained to the policy min limit then). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 16 +++++++++------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c @@ -2527,7 +2527,7 @@ static void intel_cpufreq_trace(struct c } static void intel_cpufreq_adjust_hwp(struct cpudata *cpu, u32 target_pstate, - bool fast_switch) + bool strict, bool fast_switch) { u64 prev = READ_ONCE(cpu->hwp_req_cached), value = prev; @@ -2539,7 +2539,7 @@ static void intel_cpufreq_adjust_hwp(str * field in it, so opportunistically update the max too if needed. */ value &= ~HWP_MAX_PERF(~0L); - value |= HWP_MAX_PERF(cpu->max_perf_ratio); + value |= HWP_MAX_PERF(strict ? target_pstate : cpu->max_perf_ratio); if (value == prev) return; @@ -2562,14 +2562,16 @@ static void intel_cpufreq_adjust_perf_ct pstate_funcs.get_val(cpu, target_pstate)); } -static int intel_cpufreq_update_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu, int target_pstate, - bool fast_switch) +static int intel_cpufreq_update_pstate(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, + int target_pstate, bool fast_switch) { + struct cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]; int old_pstate = cpu->pstate.current_pstate; target_pstate = intel_pstate_prepare_request(cpu, target_pstate); if (hwp_active) { - intel_cpufreq_adjust_hwp(cpu, target_pstate, fast_switch); + intel_cpufreq_adjust_hwp(cpu, target_pstate, + policy->strict_target, fast_switch); cpu->pstate.current_pstate = target_pstate; } else if (target_pstate != old_pstate) { intel_cpufreq_adjust_perf_ctl(cpu, target_pstate, fast_switch); @@ -2609,7 +2611,7 @@ static int intel_cpufreq_target(struct c break; } - target_pstate = intel_cpufreq_update_pstate(cpu, target_pstate, false); + target_pstate = intel_cpufreq_update_pstate(policy, target_pstate, false); freqs.new = target_pstate * cpu->pstate.scaling; @@ -2628,7 +2630,7 @@ static unsigned int intel_cpufreq_fast_s target_pstate = DIV_ROUND_UP(target_freq, cpu->pstate.scaling); - target_pstate = intel_cpufreq_update_pstate(cpu, target_pstate, true); + target_pstate = intel_cpufreq_update_pstate(policy, target_pstate, true); return target_pstate * cpu->pstate.scaling; }