From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932829AbdC2WrV (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:47:21 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:46057 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932172AbdC2WrU (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:47:20 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Juri Lelli Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, luca.abeni@santannapisa.it, claudio@evidence.eu.com, tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it, bristot@redhat.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, tkjos@android.com, joelaf@google.com, andresoportus@google.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@arm.com, Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [RFD PATCH 4/5] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:41:36 +0200 Message-ID: <2348394.hDdCk9fbgK@aspire.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.10.0+; KDE/4.14.9; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20170324140900.7334-5-juri.lelli@arm.com> References: <20170324140900.7334-1-juri.lelli@arm.com> <20170324140900.7334-5-juri.lelli@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday, March 24, 2017 02:08:59 PM Juri Lelli wrote: > No assumption can be made upon the rate at which frequency updates get > triggered, as there are scheduling policies (like SCHED_DEADLINE) which > don't trigger them so frequently. > > Remove such assumption from the code. But the util/max values for idle CPUs may be stale, no? Thanks, Rafael