From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1202BC77B7E for ; Tue, 2 May 2023 10:14:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233693AbjEBKOf (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 May 2023 06:14:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55250 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233737AbjEBKO2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 May 2023 06:14:28 -0400 Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp (www262.sakura.ne.jp [202.181.97.72]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3994C2123; Tue, 2 May 2023 03:14:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fsav111.sakura.ne.jp (fsav111.sakura.ne.jp [27.133.134.238]) by www262.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 342ADoYD095814; Tue, 2 May 2023 19:13:50 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp) Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp (202.181.97.72) by fsav111.sakura.ne.jp (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/fsav111.sakura.ne.jp); Tue, 02 May 2023 19:13:50 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/fsav111.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (M106072142033.v4.enabler.ne.jp [106.72.142.33]) (authenticated bits=0) by www262.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 342ADig8095778 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 2 May 2023 19:13:50 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp) Message-ID: <237a9064-78bb-1fe9-4293-1409a705d2d1@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 19:13:43 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 Subject: Re: [syzbot] [mm?] KCSAN: data-race in generic_fillattr / shmem_mknod (2) From: Tetsuo Handa To: linux-fsdevel , Alexander Viro Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hughd@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, syzbot , Dmitry Vyukov References: <0000000000007337c705fa1060e2@google.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2023/05/01 23:05, Tetsuo Handa wrote: >> Also, there was a similar report on updating i_{ctime,mtime} to current_time() >> which means that i_size is not the only field that is causing data race. >> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=067d40ab9ab23a6fa0a8156857ed54e295062a29 > > Do we want to as well wrap i_{ctime,mtime} using data_race() ? > I think we need to use inode_lock_shared()/inode_unlock_shared() when calling generic_fillattr(), for i_{ctime,mtime} (128bits) are too large to copy atomically. Is it safe to call inode_lock_shared()/inode_unlock_shared() from generic_fillattr()? Is some filesystem already holding inode lock before calling generic_fillattr()?