From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=U9wM=P5=vger.kernel.org=linux-fsdevel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC99C282DB
	for <linux-fsdevel@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 10:33:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C35520870
	for <linux-fsdevel@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 10:33:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1726222AbfAUKdg (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 21 Jan 2019 05:33:36 -0500
Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp ([202.181.97.72]:16653 "EHLO
        www262.sakura.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1726063AbfAUKdg (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 21 Jan 2019 05:33:36 -0500
Received: from fsav102.sakura.ne.jp (fsav102.sakura.ne.jp [27.133.134.229])
        by www262.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x0LAXF6Z056444;
        Mon, 21 Jan 2019 19:33:15 +0900 (JST)
        (envelope-from penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp)
Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp (202.181.97.72)
 by fsav102.sakura.ne.jp (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/530/fsav102.sakura.ne.jp);
 Mon, 21 Jan 2019 19:33:15 +0900 (JST)
X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/530/fsav102.sakura.ne.jp)
Received: from [192.168.1.8] (softbank126126163036.bbtec.net [126.126.163.36])
        (authenticated bits=0)
        by www262.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x0LAXFMg056441
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
        Mon, 21 Jan 2019 19:33:15 +0900 (JST)
        (envelope-from penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: ratelimit __find_get_block_slow() failure message.
To:     Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
References: <04c6d87c-fc26-b994-3b34-947414984abe@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
 <CACT4Y+brHvfKHb2CvkBFRxrm0hXKA+j_eW=orSWGWutcQwZ9iw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACT4Y+atyYbmrkyX0n+kvBWOt0OaauQbvrRhpUezaHXce5ZDrA@mail.gmail.com>
 <54b68f21-c8b5-7074-74e0-06e3d7ee4003@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
 <CACT4Y+ZyP2QGL3ENJZRe8qbiL8SB8yDPHRY-npTzb14+LB05RQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190116104308.GC26069@quack2.suse.cz>
 <CACT4Y+akwPNEAiBtd5j6r0M6M7DmXV3kig+bnDL39H7uu44O3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACT4Y+Zn0CyCmKRg3v76gesnAj1i7qaBdzGEzk1ecnwnKSkLaQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190116162813.GA5446@kroah.com>
 <CACT4Y+a0=45WTbtyuMOq1y5aHw1W-o7c5t3YFnOPeAfgswTA1g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190121083737.GA6566@quack2.suse.cz>
From:   Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Message-ID: <2397b6f2-30dd-7d06-0fc1-cffc77dd2188@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 19:33:13 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190121083737.GA6566@quack2.suse.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org

On 2019/01/21 17:37, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 17-01-19 14:18:56, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> Also a good question is how many other my patches were lost that I now
>> have no idea about? I discovered this one by pure accident.
> 
> Well, I do keep track of my own submitted patches in my git tree and
> occasionally sweep through it and resubmit / ping about lost ones. But yes,
> it requires some motivation and self-discipline which is not always present
> for drive-by contributions.

I use quilt. quilt is simple and easier for me than git. You can maintain a
file named "series" and do "quilt push -a" && "quilt pop -a" for automatic
checking. By the way, isn't Andrew Morton still using quilt?