From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECAA2035F for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 21:24:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754069AbcJYVYF (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:24:05 -0400 Received: from bsmtp.bon.at ([213.33.87.14]:53712 "EHLO bsmtp.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751741AbcJYVYE (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:24:04 -0400 Received: from dx.site (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3t3R3j4LYFz5tlG; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:24:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.site (Postfix) with ESMTP id 159855348; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:24:01 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2016, #06; Mon, 24) To: Stefan Beller References: Cc: Junio C Hamano , "git@vger.kernel.org" , Johannes Schindelin From: Johannes Sixt Message-ID: <23f15627-4964-7ba9-45c3-899366d621bd@kdbg.org> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:24:00 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Am 25.10.2016 um 20:13 schrieb Stefan Beller: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> - the "off-by-one fix" part of sb/submodule-ignore-trailing-slash >> needs to be in the upcoming release but the "trailing /. in base >> should not affect the resolution of ../relative/path" part that >> is still under discussion can wait. Which means we'd need a few >> more !MINGW prerequisites in the tests by -rc0. >>[...] > > So maybe instead of adding !MINGW we rather want to apply > https://public-inbox.org/git/2908451e-4273-8826-8989-5572263cc283@kdbg.org/ > instead for now? I was about to submit this very patch again, and only then saw your message. So, yes, that's what I propose, too. Dscho, does this patch fix the test failures that you observed, too? Unfortunately, it goes against our endeavor to reduce subshells. -- Hannes