From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE98C2BA19 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:06:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28ACB20737 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:06:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=citrix.com header.i=@citrix.com header.b="bP2XhgbH" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 28ACB20737 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=citrix.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jOhk8-0001Jx-VY; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:06:16 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jOhk8-0001Jp-1K for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:06:16 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: e30cc6a6-7f19-11ea-b58d-bc764e2007e4 Received: from esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com (unknown [216.71.155.168]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id e30cc6a6-7f19-11ea-b58d-bc764e2007e4; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:06:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=citrix.com; s=securemail; t=1586955975; h=from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id: date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references; bh=c5C3O4DQWQWnKvdfxBn1JnwkNHvHOdD5NuUuLCzLZbk=; b=bP2XhgbH2NcAU4cD8Y/gy58VLRxvsqxqgxz/Ulzju1+eSjUYCKIRElIM zWtvxd7yWdQeGtq/OSAaZ/pnRTxqu0HzBTgiOBYNrwNXFTKoJK+BK5z0G ivLi0uD8apPJobBDUlpT/wq6NXNejEjnsPfhJclYp2XjSeLnB0qOVFtJs g=; Authentication-Results: esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=None smtp.pra=ian.jackson@citrix.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=Ian.Jackson@citrix.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mail.citrix.com Received-SPF: None (esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of ian.jackson@citrix.com) identity=pra; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Ian.Jackson@citrix.com"; x-sender="ian.jackson@citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: domain of Ian.Jackson@citrix.com designates 162.221.158.21 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Ian.Jackson@citrix.com"; x-sender="Ian.Jackson@citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"; x-record-text="v=spf1 ip4:209.167.231.154 ip4:178.63.86.133 ip4:195.66.111.40/30 ip4:85.115.9.32/28 ip4:199.102.83.4 ip4:192.28.146.160 ip4:192.28.146.107 ip4:216.52.6.88 ip4:216.52.6.188 ip4:162.221.158.21 ip4:162.221.156.83 ip4:168.245.78.127 ~all" Received-SPF: None (esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail.citrix.com) identity=helo; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Ian.Jackson@citrix.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail.citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible IronPort-SDR: Doz4JmH4vMNYy482yESTydNSqcnBhFu/kBIqRiW/DTUitZal3NcDtySbiR2w3ttvskjaR8Gauc MmLwuwvL4mpI6s4RQ/QLwsUsXZvkLeOFXfWXD0KrxqKDexEWtLZnJfrIhRXwLYfaRih6LYVgVZ hS1iJPKSrN3SwQn237KLnD7M8uWBPKi67EzMr1gPmIbE2BCNlr1iPwiTZKTKv2kuCOIGW+8n2a C6zZxrKUBmMzmXqCJ1O3DzsTnpm5vWSZZ8JCiKpYCIpBQxcq1vy8XReuN13m0v6hXV/g9S0wmD VD8= X-SBRS: 2.7 X-MesageID: 16031417 X-Ironport-Server: esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Remote-IP: 162.221.158.21 X-Policy: $RELAYED X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,386,1580792400"; d="scan'208";a="16031417" From: Ian Jackson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <24215.1729.892903.300149@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 14:06:09 +0100 To: Roger Pau Monne Subject: Re: [PATCH OSSTEST 2/2] make-flight: add a core scheduling job In-Reply-To: <20200415085246.7945-2-roger.pau@citrix.com> References: <20200415085246.7945-1-roger.pau@citrix.com> <20200415085246.7945-2-roger.pau@citrix.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.5.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" Roger Pau Monne writes ("[PATCH OSSTEST 2/2] make-flight: add a core scheduling job"): > Run a simple core scheduling tests on a host that has SMT support. > This is only enabled for Xen >= 4.13. ... > + # Core-scheduling tests are x86 only > + if [ x$test_coresched = xy -a $xenarch = amd64 ]; then > + job_create_test test-$xenarch$kern-coresched-$dom0arch-xl \ > + test-debian xl $xenarch $dom0arch $debian_runvars \ > + all_hostflags=$most_hostflags,smt \ > + xen_boot_append='sched-gran=core' > + > + fi This seems fine as far as it goes, but all it does is check that things still work if sched-gran=core is passed. I'm not sure whether anything more sophisticated is needed, and in any case this is a step in the right direction, so: Acked-by: Ian Jackson (subject to my comment on 1/ about the flag name.) Ian.