From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DDAC2BB55 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5B562063A for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=citrix.com header.i=@citrix.com header.b="XfU6Um+a" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A5B562063A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=citrix.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jP7qY-0004rj-V4; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:58:38 +0000 Received: from all-amaz-eas1.inumbo.com ([34.197.232.57] helo=us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jP7qX-0004rd-D2 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:58:37 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 81e98fc2-8003-11ea-8bd1-12813bfff9fa Received: from esa2.hc3370-68.iphmx.com (unknown [216.71.145.153]) by us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 81e98fc2-8003-11ea-8bd1-12813bfff9fa; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:58:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=citrix.com; s=securemail; t=1587056314; h=from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id: date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references; bh=+A7o7zIGoVU/FcjMkxo6qjyBi0s/hnC1sRn3hc0hJNk=; b=XfU6Um+aABPDD4m47CK3f2uzm3sb3l43FPWdR4N2gjrnNku/NUX2WWuK wwGjYsQlmL/VQjYp+R7uz4S0oirR8vNhT2HUrb4WrastaBmAEdECKguXi mHrUA+2h7zvZrG+JE/L5Eprwjdhu3vzyBGIsl3H45vne+orPTVnvLKuC4 0=; Authentication-Results: esa2.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=None smtp.pra=ian.jackson@citrix.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=Ian.Jackson@citrix.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mail.citrix.com Received-SPF: None (esa2.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of ian.jackson@citrix.com) identity=pra; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa2.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Ian.Jackson@citrix.com"; x-sender="ian.jackson@citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (esa2.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: domain of Ian.Jackson@citrix.com designates 162.221.158.21 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa2.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Ian.Jackson@citrix.com"; x-sender="Ian.Jackson@citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"; x-record-text="v=spf1 ip4:209.167.231.154 ip4:178.63.86.133 ip4:195.66.111.40/30 ip4:85.115.9.32/28 ip4:199.102.83.4 ip4:192.28.146.160 ip4:192.28.146.107 ip4:216.52.6.88 ip4:216.52.6.188 ip4:162.221.158.21 ip4:162.221.156.83 ip4:168.245.78.127 ~all" Received-SPF: None (esa2.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail.citrix.com) identity=helo; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa2.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Ian.Jackson@citrix.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail.citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible IronPort-SDR: shuKxPwSXk6ubQUn927O1TLTBkZC0MGHX9m4jAArEGQG7C2+DYGn4QmMJK3qQpgszcgCQ9rYz1 y9jBdboYm2J/XoOvpmaxpSfGpD0t91i3GhiWHMnnKYMS2wMnNP36cRF+cUZvBqIhwnPI6WRpZg 6ls99KBVDB0ZgETaT5QlV/xZ5soeDKyNonFBSDEF5T3nEqSR7pydWN5l5tdU0M8PBqruY2ZLx4 /4y2L8o3n8d+IvloqWo95KuTnFJ0XYK6tQ0ajsLQEtOEhmiMe1bMLJruYgbbmCphUCGEX9XO6y UTs= X-SBRS: 2.7 X-MesageID: 15810236 X-Ironport-Server: esa2.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Remote-IP: 162.221.158.21 X-Policy: $RELAYED X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,391,1580792400"; d="scan'208";a="15810236" From: Ian Jackson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <24216.36520.20579.92616@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:58:16 +0100 To: Roger Pau Monne Subject: Re: [PATCH OSSTEST 2/2] make-flight: add a core scheduling job In-Reply-To: <20200416163607.GO28601@Air-de-Roger> References: <20200415085246.7945-1-roger.pau@citrix.com> <20200415085246.7945-2-roger.pau@citrix.com> <24215.1729.892903.300149@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20200416163607.GO28601@Air-de-Roger> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.5.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , Dario Faggioli Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" Roger Pau Monne writes ("Re: [PATCH OSSTEST 2/2] make-flight: add a core scheduling job"): > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 06:28:33PM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > Yep, and that's enough for enabling and starting using ore-scheduling. > > So, doing like this, core-scheduling should get the same amount and > > kind of testing that scheduling in general gets. > > Well, we run a lot more tests without 'sched-gran=core', but I don't > think it's feasible to duplicate the matrix to run all tests with and > without core-scheduling. Yes, I agree with Roger. > > One question, as my OSSTest-fu is a bit rusty... does this create > > "sched-gran=core" tests for all the schedulers? Or just one of them for > > th default scheduler? > > Just for the default scheduler ATM, we can expand this if required. > The test also is very simple, as it just creates a Debian PV guest > and does some basic life cycle operations, it's exactly like the job > below but with 'sched-gran=core': > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/149667/test-amd64-amd64-xl/info.html Right. Thanks, Ian.