From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0DAC2BB55 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26E9E2078E for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=citrix.com header.i=@citrix.com header.b="gPFevS3b" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 26E9E2078E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=citrix.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jP82C-0006Qa-56; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:10:40 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jP82B-0006QV-9m for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:10:39 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 315c653c-8005-11ea-83d8-bc764e2007e4 Received: from esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com (unknown [216.71.155.144]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 315c653c-8005-11ea-83d8-bc764e2007e4; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:10:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=citrix.com; s=securemail; t=1587057038; h=from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id: date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references; bh=qfkSq7URKpvXjF7lnJTFYslcRpwMyj8W2lwX2JJDTYQ=; b=gPFevS3bLIoEU5EHfyYXnEtcpCDk9pxbSru9O2GSFwNfp0KwUAojosKZ vKpbqDEoAmysJpo8qqcTSDP/dfIxx9whw8B4DGR+ct5clnLUzmNrA1Wvw 7olgE5g0Eq/HSvUXsV7qWDp0VVVf+Q6j+v6TIKlB2yOErSPcI0JO7myG/ Y=; Authentication-Results: esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=None smtp.pra=ian.jackson@citrix.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=Ian.Jackson@citrix.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mail.citrix.com Received-SPF: None (esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of ian.jackson@citrix.com) identity=pra; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Ian.Jackson@citrix.com"; x-sender="ian.jackson@citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: domain of Ian.Jackson@citrix.com designates 162.221.158.21 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Ian.Jackson@citrix.com"; x-sender="Ian.Jackson@citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"; x-record-text="v=spf1 ip4:209.167.231.154 ip4:178.63.86.133 ip4:195.66.111.40/30 ip4:85.115.9.32/28 ip4:199.102.83.4 ip4:192.28.146.160 ip4:192.28.146.107 ip4:216.52.6.88 ip4:216.52.6.188 ip4:162.221.158.21 ip4:162.221.156.83 ip4:168.245.78.127 ~all" Received-SPF: None (esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail.citrix.com) identity=helo; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Ian.Jackson@citrix.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail.citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible IronPort-SDR: NpvzHCUBFzCkdF2r9vzy0co5kUkHtjY9NtEeobzKYtXkfKVg+HU46L2uDkCHqvl/kCXHEc4ORS uPA4eQfCXmLEIGrNTR8XWAZzcP9WyQbroK0CsApgO/vVVOb9oA/qK/zmTpasllvwJ0bQ+etQp3 0VIdrHSJGPLXoYGNrWJ+Ye+GK0MZF0DrSNsXUde4bL6wIpcQsAd80pfeT9qvL8CI5vCtTUDIGd WGS8cWSnnxj58C4LE0SPdkn5MTKa/ayUw/e8vLyodj3bdJLGQd98vK2feNfZJ4+0vo7z/9CZA/ 2hQ= X-SBRS: 2.7 X-MesageID: 16472943 X-Ironport-Server: esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Remote-IP: 162.221.158.21 X-Policy: $RELAYED X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,391,1580792400"; d="scan'208";a="16472943" From: Ian Jackson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <24216.37252.294936.717519@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 18:10:28 +0100 To: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: [PATCH OSSTEST 2/2] make-flight: add a core scheduling job In-Reply-To: <96263bbd41717d68bb35f14163973267a29ef0e4.camel@suse.com> References: <20200415085246.7945-1-roger.pau@citrix.com> <20200415085246.7945-2-roger.pau@citrix.com> <24215.1729.892903.300149@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20200416163607.GO28601@Air-de-Roger> <96263bbd41717d68bb35f14163973267a29ef0e4.camel@suse.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.5.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , Roger Pau =?iso-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [PATCH OSSTEST 2/2] make-flight: add a core scheduling job"): > Ok, sure. Maybe it would make sense to add just another one for Credit, > sooner rather than later, as I guess there may be people wanting to > continue use Credit, but they may want to try it with core-scheduling. Maybe in return we could delete the rtds test which has been marked nonblocking forever and which no-one seems to be fixing ? :-) Patches welcome... Ian.