From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B5FC433DB for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 15:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C997D2368A for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 15:44:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C997D2368A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.63662.113000 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kxtw0-000704-Du; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 15:44:16 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 63662.113000; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 15:44:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kxtw0-0006zx-Ad; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 15:44:16 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 63662; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 15:44:15 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kxtvz-0006zq-EF for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 15:44:15 +0000 Received: from mx2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.15]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 53b008cc-8cac-4067-aca7-c27f253d7c7a; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 15:44:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C98AD57; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 15:44:13 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 53b008cc-8cac-4067-aca7-c27f253d7c7a X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1610120653; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8g+tj2JtPNoQ7CZyT+IytW0ZOERM6Tlml//M6BbTNvE=; b=PRT8esFdhtDIlovpEpYvoFK9uiYQWyHdp8I4FjPsi1+MGrrefLZtYYErDi2HiRE7+YmxHS fjNEPY6YBtilqXO8/5qCoefmglQOad3QZQC4nsms1IHZ3iwRY/Fe1/ry3DNzC6zwJ7e+I4 0gw2aSZnqaA/d8UURFIotT/uRhxhblo= Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] xen: add hypfs per-domain abi-features To: Juergen Gross Cc: paul@xen.org, Andrew Cooper , George Dunlap , Ian Jackson , Julien Grall , Stefano Stabellini , Wei Liu , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org References: <20201209161618.309-1-jgross@suse.com> From: Jan Beulich Message-ID: <2423a745-b5f3-a1e6-bd26-81193c289b23@suse.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 16:44:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201209161618.309-1-jgross@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 09.12.2020 17:16, Juergen Gross wrote: > This small series is meant as an example how to add further dynamical > directories to hypfs. It can be used to replace Paul's current approach > to specify ABI-features via domain create flags and replace those by > hypfs nodes. Actually, before I look at further of the patches here: I seem to vaguely recall agreement was reached to stick to Paul's approach for the time being? Or am I misremembering? Jan