From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A9EC433E0 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 152F02137B for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:03:24 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 152F02137B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=xenproject.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.71640.128437 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l2Gsx-0000YB-ON; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:03:11 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 71640.128437; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:03:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l2Gsx-0000Y4-Jk; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:03:11 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 71640; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:03:10 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l2Gsw-0000Xz-8N for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:03:10 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l2Gsw-0005W6-55 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:03:10 +0000 Received: from iwj (helo=mariner.uk.xensource.com) by xenbits.xenproject.org with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l2Gsw-0005Bs-3r for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:03:10 +0000 Received: from iwj by mariner.uk.xensource.com with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1l2Gsr-0006U5-7a; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:03:05 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xenproject.org; s=20200302mail; h=References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:Date :Message-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:From; bh=kEkf0UEKS7STVkrng+HT4/sKLn7rDMbh/Gzwprp572I=; b=i6vqNNW9ytALHwdkhTXOwAo5bL PC4BdogOnmp+uhDc5cpYVKaKxoLxUSyJdL2rcR5JzvjmgAuHMEyKZfqscVnNfFsFYZ0MurNIvpAJm bCeUwovbT7xGmszBbg3Vdy4rLNY+9N76pF+eShCe/ruYdEPIEHlMKnnSEZj9JPicDgIc=; From: Ian Jackson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <24584.25160.985697.319853@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:03:04 +0000 To: Manuel Bouyer Cc: Roger Pau =?iso-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/24] Introduce locking functions for block device setup on NetBSD In-Reply-To: <20210120165923.GC5035@antioche.eu.org> References: <20201214163623.2127-1-bouyer@netbsd.org> <20201214163623.2127-6-bouyer@netbsd.org> <20201229112909.kprjtysxkg4p6y2i@Air-de-Roger> <20210104102037.GA2005@antioche.eu.org> <24584.18578.623201.789017@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20210120155900.GA5035@antioche.eu.org> <24584.22125.355284.48139@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20210120165923.GC5035@antioche.eu.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.5.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Manuel Bouyer writes ("Re: [PATCH 05/24] Introduce locking functions for block device setup on NetBSD"): > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 04:12:29PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I think NetBSD's stat(1) also takes different argumnts to specify the > > format. NetBSD uses -f, whereas Linux uses -c. So the exact rune > > will have to be different. > > Yes, and NetBSD doens't have %D (only %d) What's really important here is the inode number. But %d will do nicely. I only used %D on Linux since device numbers are two-element bitfields so displaying them in hex makes more sense to humans who might be debugging this. Ian.