From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF49C433E0 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 15:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 409A664F6B for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 15:15:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 409A664F6B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=xenproject.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.81340.150164 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7gLw-0004zW-7x; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:15:28 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 81340.150164; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:15:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7gLw-0004zP-4V; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:15:28 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 81340; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:15:26 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7gLu-0004zK-E1 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:15:26 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7gLu-0005Kb-DB for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:15:26 +0000 Received: from iwj (helo=mariner.uk.xensource.com) by xenbits.xenproject.org with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7gLu-0007x9-CQ for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:15:26 +0000 Received: from iwj by mariner.uk.xensource.com with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1l7gLp-0008RJ-JB; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:15:21 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xenproject.org; s=20200302mail; h=References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:Date :Message-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:From; bh=NlPeA61U6fKbMrSYtmqwXVA+DoGYH1Ieez3LKo8X+VY=; b=xNPt9LE4pMG0vPM4QgEQK7UT67 f5Ozj9zkKsjQVmSir8rWi5lsecr60WFJeczM7SHl+DGF25c7zdK3MU7cUu9raIBhHyCAQ4XKIamYI WXHMiwa1/mUqP6/S+F/6E/NCKuAaW5SRjHQSmQT0plM3PpE/ZYO1YJIZmgaDRH9P/x6g=; From: Ian Jackson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <24604.3977.348615.728094@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 15:15:21 +0000 To: Andrew Cooper Cc: , , Dario Faggioli , Jan Beulich , Julien Grall , Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Xen 4.15 - call for notification/status of significant bugs In-Reply-To: References: <24600.8030.769396.165224@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <24603.58528.901884.980466@mariner.uk.xensource.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.5.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [ANNOUNCE] Xen 4.15 - call for notification/status of significant bugs"): > On 04/02/2021 12:12, Ian Jackson wrote: > > OPEN ISSUES > > ----------- > > > > A. HPET/PIT issue on newer Intel systems ... > > I think Andrew is still on the case here. > > Fixed.  c/s e1de4c196a from a week ago. > > > C. Fallout from MSR handling behavioral change. ... > Still WIP and on my TODO list.  In addition to Jan's report, there is a > separate report from Boris against Solaris.  Also I need to revert a > patch of mine from early in the release and do the same thing differently. > > Bugs are "VMs which boot on earlier releases don't boot on 4.15 at the > moment". Thanks for this information, which I have noted. Ian.