From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB8FC2B9F4 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACFAA613B4 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:38:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ACFAA613B4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=xenproject.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.145854.268281 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lvejJ-0001I5-Cw; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:38:09 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 145854.268281; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:38:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lvejJ-0001Hy-9y; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:38:09 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 145854; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:38:08 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lvejI-0001Hs-HD for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:38:08 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lvejI-0001ds-CZ for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:38:08 +0000 Received: from iwj (helo=mariner.uk.xensource.com) by xenbits.xenproject.org with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lvejI-00028M-Bd for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:38:08 +0000 Received: from iwj by mariner.uk.xensource.com with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1lvejE-0003Xy-Q3; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 12:38:04 +0100 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xenproject.org; s=20200302mail; h=References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:Date :Message-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:From; bh=GuDijgEM/gxBLTHzy3G1iP3qZzBVCe1tc04lGY29Sy8=; b=N30Dc9PXAtoVz2r4lnlERSbagP lgEaBLt4pyahPO6AHlk5byJwz7obAzWwJUfOaTCKxQHu2+VF61LLDkxD5KaXbj8fQ0SrKjoj6Yk1f lpqCv7gcuQ1dD0FqHYmm6aWoD5ylcrp/zOvnLPtm5mQGMZAAI/pByl+RYBhW5Dg8nL0A=; From: Ian Jackson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <24785.52124.476428.674630@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 12:38:04 +0100 To: Jan Beulich Cc: "xen-devel\@lists.xenproject.org" , Andrew Cooper , Wei Liu , Roger Pau =?iso-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= , Juergen Gross Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] libxencall: introduce variant of xencall2() returning long In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.5.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Jan Beulich writes ("[PATCH 3/5] libxencall: introduce variant of xencall2() returning long"): > Some hypercalls, memory-op in particular, can return values requiring > more than 31 bits to represent. Hence the underlying layers need to make > sure they won't truncate such values. Thanks for this. All 5 patches: Acked-by: Ian Jackson Nit: > While adding the new function to the map file, I noticed the stray > xencall6 there. I'm taking the liberty to remove it at this occasion. If > such a function would ever appear, it shouldn't lane in version 1.0. ^^^^ Typo for "land", I think. Ian.