From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52BF9C43331 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 12:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D4420776 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 12:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="f7sqGqZI" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732253AbgDAMFo (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2020 08:05:44 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:20142 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732246AbgDAMFo (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2020 08:05:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1585742743; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+GR7MHEG6xiBbbkMGHrCHUiX06iUrxcdELI0CxLfVTo=; b=f7sqGqZI0rvD8I7UrwxvZ+ovZwX7m9q8g8gr03tQAZUuoRTz1NcZsf5asJT3GE6rkb8pDI eaD2IR2NEP3gY3CGG3Ky3ZkpEO/DQd9tk/aDtOgxjCC4IikkT9K5qXHmqKu6xaHmLq6jXz yU6vQm31w+NKYljCb8CqiRXC9mlZ7rc= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-370-XALTqPojP4mFhLhFshbhmQ-1; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 08:05:41 -0400 X-MC-Unique: XALTqPojP4mFhLhFshbhmQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D128BDB60; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 12:05:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (ovpn-114-243.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.243]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CBC999DFD; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 12:05:38 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Why does test-fsinfo require static libraries? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2479848.1585742738.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 13:05:38 +0100 Message-ID: <2479849.1585742738@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Miklos Szeredi wrote: > This is annoying: > > HOSTCC samples/vfs/test-fsinfo > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lm > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lc > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Sorry, yes. I've been building on one system and running on an older one and the libraries are incompatible. I need to undo that bit. David