From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E2DC433F5 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:43:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5558E60FD7 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:43:35 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 5558E60FD7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=xenproject.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.197024.349952 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mUrqi-0003O9-TL; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:43:20 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 197024.349952; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:43:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mUrqi-0003O2-Q3; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:43:20 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 197024; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:43:19 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mUrqh-0003Nw-6X for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:43:19 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mUrqh-0001XX-5V for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:43:19 +0000 Received: from iwj (helo=mariner.uk.xensource.com) by xenbits.xenproject.org with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mUrqh-0005M7-4E for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:43:19 +0000 Received: from iwj by mariner.uk.xensource.com with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1mUrqd-0000lG-LW; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:43:15 +0100 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xenproject.org; s=20200302mail; h=References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:Date :Message-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:From; bh=1TRhJg8PYLjD3J6NES3KkqVbp7A6faSg0tvEFu/PVEQ=; b=WzE9SKC+WjHQCmbRwBVZVOaQrl FLmTGsgmoyU0C3XPPU3cBeGHSTX+VkFvjzhOahoKZZ6iQhLvwH2q+SQgdAZJqF9k/mbAvBDDztDen E+/DYAUCICKAttZO7ITriW1L0+nSqpwhS8WHYArGJ5iuuPexj6E5c+42vuSd6bEMN+mY=; From: Ian Jackson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <24913.55427.402592.660538@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:43:15 +0100 To: Juergen Gross Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Andrew Cooper , George Dunlap , Jan Beulich , Julien Grall , Stefano Stabellini , Wei Liu , Samuel Thibault , Community Manager Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] disable building of pv-grub and qemu-trad per default In-Reply-To: References: <20210910055518.562-1-jgross@suse.com> <24891.31480.165445.521062@mariner.uk.xensource.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.5.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Juergen Gross writes ("Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] disable building of pv-grub and qemu-trad per default"): > On 10.09.21 17:34, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Juergen Gross writes ("[PATCH v3 0/3] disable building of pv-grub and qemu-trad per default"): > >> This is a first step of deprecating pv-grub and qemu-trad including > >> ioemu-stubdom. Switch the default to not building it. > > > > This is now fully acked. But can we wait with committing it until we > > have a decision about whether to (a) have osstest explicitly enable > > the pv-grub and qemu-trad builds (b) have osstest stop testing these > > configurations ? > > Any decisions made? No-one seems to have had any opinions. I'll take ... > FWIW I'd be fine dropping pv-grub builds and tests in OSStets, but I'd > rather keep testing qemu-trad stubdom tests. ... that as a proposal :-). think that is probably the right tradeoff. I think that means that means we need osstest patches to edit make-flight and ts-xen-build which * Explictly enables stubdom qemu build * Drops the pv-grub tests and those need to go in first. With my RM hat on, I think those changes to osstest may need a release ack since they have missed the LPD, but I will grant such an ack. As for the patches themselves, I may get to that tomorrow, but contributions would be very welcome. Thanks, Ian.