From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71758C433F5 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 10:26:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 385DA61051 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 10:26:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 385DA61051 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=xenproject.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.219087.379728 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhUVe-0005U8-FM; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 10:25:46 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 219087.379728; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 10:25:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhUVe-0005U1-CP; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 10:25:46 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 219087; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 10:25:45 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhUVd-0005Tv-Iw for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 10:25:45 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhUVd-0005M4-IG for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 10:25:45 +0000 Received: from iwj (helo=mariner.uk.xensource.com) by xenbits.xenproject.org with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhUVd-0005dG-HK for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 10:25:45 +0000 Received: from iwj by mariner.uk.xensource.com with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1mhUVW-0004eC-QJ; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 10:25:38 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xenproject.org; s=20200302mail; h=References:In-Reply-To:Subject:CC:To:Date :Message-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:From; bh=klPRxQC5wAKP9DcnwRGu1wZSa/yz5tGiI9VDXmMFkF4=; b=TTh9r5hUJskAU41XnnB35vtcDd NCp3n6waIoG7U+yiDoJQszPyRw7V0WA1wVxYYMBN0+Ub7tNgvRBhEbJltCpSyNroi0oKCgp7j8W5i LznlXsmrGINGNd8seg50AN/fAM/HXyU76k08C0tO282VeijnlKyKQjPAc7K87KfJexfo=; From: Ian Jackson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <24959.49313.936961.936820@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 10:25:37 +0000 To: Julien Grall , Oleksandr Andrushchenko CC: Roger Pau =?iso-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , "sstabellini@kernel.org" , Bertrand Marquis , Rahul Singh Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: fix SBDF calculation for vPCI MMIO handlers [and 2 more messages] In-Reply-To: <24953.34635.645112.279110@mariner.uk.xensource.com>, <24954.51153.588540.850154@mariner.uk.xensource.com>, References: <20211027082533.1406015-1-andr2000@gmail.com> <65886734-7333-4469-fcc1-6916db708f13@xen.org> <6d8f1061-7aec-2c1a-aaf4-c30440c2797a@xen.org> <38da2edd-06a2-63d0-51ad-1284272c8da5@epam.com> <24954.51153.588540.850154@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <0bbe4d1d-421d-e816-42aa-f43581902a02@epam.com> <24953.34635.645112.279110@mariner.uk.xensource.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.5.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: fix SBDF calculation for vPCI MMIO handlers"): > On 28/10/2021 16:54, Ian Jackson wrote: > > There are a number of patches that I'm getting CC'd on related to ARM > > and vpci (according to the Subject). Are these targeted for 4.16 ? > > Most of them don't have 4.16 Subject tags. > > Oleksandr wants this patch to be included for 4.16 but forgot to tag it > properly. Oh yes. However, 1. I also wrote this: > > I am finding it difficult to see the wood for the trees. > > It would be really helpful if these vpci fixes were collected > > together into a series. Can someone please confirm whether this is the only vpci-related patch that ought to be on my radar for 4.16 ? 2. I have not had a reply to my question on Wednesday in <24953.34635.645112.279110@mariner.uk.xensource.com>: Um, can you explain what the practical impact is of not taking this patch for 4.16 ? As I understand it vpci for ARM is non-functional in 4.16 and this is not expected to change ? So there would be no benefit to users, and taking the patch would add small but nonzero risk ? I need this information to decide whether a release-ack is appropriate. Note that we are in code freeze so all patches, including bugfixes, need my ack. Thanks, Ian.