All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: fdmanana@kernel.org
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/7] btrfs: remove useless dio wait call when doing fallocate zero range
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 15:22:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <24b528bd19fa4dfd2539db3b5a61c25ae45ec278.1647357395.git.fdmanana@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1647357395.git.fdmanana@suse.com>

From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

When starting a fallocate zero range operation, before getting the first
extent map for the range, we make a call to inode_dio_wait().

This logic was needed in the past because direct IO writes within the
i_size boundary did not take the inode's VFS lock. This was because that
lock used to be a mutex, then some years ago it was switched to a rw
semaphore (by commit 9902af79c01a8e ("parallel lookups: actual switch to
rwsem")), and then btrfs was changed to take the VFS inode's lock in
shared mode for writes that don't cross the i_size boundary (done in
commit e9adabb9712ef9 ("btrfs: use shared lock for direct writes within
EOF")). The lockless direct IO writes could result in a race with the
zero range operation, resulting in the later getting a stale extent
map for the range.

So remove this no longer needed call to inode_dio_wait(), as fallocate
takes the inode's VFS lock in exclusive mode and direct IO writes within
i_size take that same lock in shared mode.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/file.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index b7c0db1000cd..2f57f7d9d9cb 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -3237,8 +3237,6 @@ static int btrfs_zero_range(struct inode *inode,
 	u64 bytes_to_reserve = 0;
 	bool space_reserved = false;
 
-	inode_dio_wait(inode);
-
 	em = btrfs_get_extent(BTRFS_I(inode), NULL, 0, alloc_start,
 			      alloc_end - alloc_start);
 	if (IS_ERR(em)) {
-- 
2.33.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-15 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-15 10:47 [PATCH 0/6] btrfs: one fallocate fix and removing outdated code for fallocate and reflinks fdmanana
2022-03-15 10:47 ` [PATCH 1/6] btrfs: only reserve the needed data space amount during fallocate fdmanana
2022-03-15 10:47 ` [PATCH 2/6] btrfs: remove useless dio wait call when doing fallocate zero range fdmanana
2022-03-15 10:47 ` [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: remove inode_dio_wait() calls when starting reflink operations fdmanana
2022-03-15 10:47 ` [PATCH 4/6] btrfs: remove ordered extent check and wait during fallocate fdmanana
2022-03-15 10:47 ` [PATCH 5/6] btrfs: remove ordered extent check and wait during hole punching and zero range fdmanana
2022-03-15 10:47 ` [PATCH 6/6] btrfs: add and use helper to assert an inode range is clean fdmanana
2022-03-15 12:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] btrfs: one fallocate fix and removing outdated code for fallocate and reflinks fdmanana
2022-03-15 12:18   ` [PATCH v2 1/7] btrfs: only reserve the needed data space amount during fallocate fdmanana
2022-03-15 13:16     ` Wang Yugui
2022-03-15 13:45       ` Filipe Manana
2022-03-15 12:18   ` [PATCH v2 2/7] btrfs: remove useless dio wait call when doing fallocate zero range fdmanana
2022-03-15 12:18   ` [PATCH v2 3/7] btrfs: remove inode_dio_wait() calls when starting reflink operations fdmanana
2022-03-15 12:18   ` [PATCH v2 4/7] btrfs: remove ordered extent check and wait during fallocate fdmanana
2022-03-15 12:18   ` [PATCH v2 5/7] btrfs: lock the inode first before flushing range when punching hole fdmanana
2022-03-15 12:18   ` [PATCH v2 6/7] btrfs: remove ordered extent check and wait during hole punching and zero range fdmanana
2022-03-15 12:18   ` [PATCH v2 7/7] btrfs: add and use helper to assert an inode range is clean fdmanana
2022-03-15 15:22 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] btrfs: one fallocate fix and removing outdated code for fallocate and reflinks fdmanana
2022-03-15 15:22   ` [PATCH v3 1/7] btrfs: only reserve the needed data space amount during fallocate fdmanana
2022-03-15 15:22   ` fdmanana [this message]
2022-03-15 15:22   ` [PATCH v3 3/7] btrfs: remove inode_dio_wait() calls when starting reflink operations fdmanana
2022-03-15 15:22   ` [PATCH v3 4/7] btrfs: remove ordered extent check and wait during fallocate fdmanana
2022-03-15 15:22   ` [PATCH v3 5/7] btrfs: lock the inode first before flushing range when punching hole fdmanana
2022-03-15 15:22   ` [PATCH v3 6/7] btrfs: remove ordered extent check and wait during hole punching and zero range fdmanana
2022-03-15 15:22   ` [PATCH v3 7/7] btrfs: add and use helper to assert an inode range is clean fdmanana
2022-03-16 16:29   ` [PATCH v3 0/7] btrfs: one fallocate fix and removing outdated code for fallocate and reflinks David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=24b528bd19fa4dfd2539db3b5a61c25ae45ec278.1647357395.git.fdmanana@suse.com \
    --to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.