From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5826BC433DF for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:33:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE4622403 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hpe.com header.i=@hpe.com header.b="gFmEEBph" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727678AbgJMMdo (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2020 08:33:44 -0400 Received: from mx0a-002e3701.pphosted.com ([148.163.147.86]:42552 "EHLO mx0a-002e3701.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727198AbgJMMdn (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2020 08:33:43 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0134420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-002e3701.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 09DCSeQL013062; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:33:39 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hpe.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pps0720; bh=qNMdHBqXqwaf90OVuzZBNx3mK1NeTl6sFfUOFag2YLI=; b=gFmEEBph2G03onC6a38/t1L03B/BsK9NEQNPzLfCI9bVZLj0MXHTTPVgZsPHpdJy2VKy M1iOOLtBUPl8yQRLEK3xnOXHPgPWceu80qYpZEzbcIxIcnXgoLJlfpBtGo1ItBuTVNDs 9HeoZhgItVctSKsc69iupb1nnU5NvtjEtMvxdxmovrs2LexT8P8z4qxaT78FWZ3ihHOK u6XRWmlYCxl0uG+lTa/8FOI967yqatBx/nnq0hvEx0MGE826RLcQTCBVBsqRBBxksAQI doRtXu9QniUiIZObd7PndC/jgx7CcFHEi3dQSJgyYVZGqLMZqdy7Gm/GBRzlsgS+8p2y dQ== Received: from g2t2354.austin.hpe.com (g2t2354.austin.hpe.com [15.233.44.27]) by mx0b-002e3701.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 343pfkka31-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:33:39 +0000 Received: from g2t2360.austin.hpecorp.net (g2t2360.austin.hpecorp.net [16.196.225.135]) by g2t2354.austin.hpe.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E9E91; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:33:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [16.99.129.135] (unknown [16.99.129.135]) by g2t2360.austin.hpecorp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BF737; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:33:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/platform updates for v5.10 To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Linus Torvalds , x86-ml , lkml References: <20201012101012.GD25311@zn.tnic> <20201012212709.GM25311@zn.tnic> <20201013111158.GD32151@zn.tnic> From: Mike Travis Message-ID: <25632026-b498-022c-f37e-444672d57ecb@hpe.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 05:33:37 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201013111158.GD32151@zn.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPE-SCL: -1 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-10-13_03:2020-10-13,2020-10-13 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=931 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2010130096 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/13/2020 4:11 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 02:58:07PM -0700, Mike Travis wrote: >> I was in the process of tracing it through and perhaps it does need a bit >> more analysis to be correct. What does it mean to send a patch to fix the >> compile error, just remove it? > > Yes, to remove it for now as it is unused currently. But making it an > unsigned long is ok too AFAICT. So should I queue it and send it to > Linus later? > I'm working on the correct code now, and I have UV4 & UV4A machine time starting at 7am (PDT) to test it. The UV5 simulator does not yet emulate console initiated NMI from the BMC.