All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Rob Clark" <robdclark@gmail.com>, "Sean Paul" <sean@poorly.run>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/20] drm/msm: always wait for the exclusive fence
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 10:48:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2582129c-b0c3-831c-a3b4-caa51be95095@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210708173754.3877540-17-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Am 08.07.21 um 19:37 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
>
> Drivers also need to to sync to the exclusive fence when
> a shared one is present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> [danvet: Not that hard to compile-test on arm ...]
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
> Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
> Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org

Wondering a bit why you have that in this patch set now.

But any objections that we push this now?

Thanks,
Christian.

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c | 16 +++++++---------
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> index 141178754231..d9c4f1deeafb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> @@ -812,17 +812,15 @@ int msm_gem_sync_object(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
>   	struct dma_fence *fence;
>   	int i, ret;
>   
> -	fobj = dma_resv_shared_list(obj->resv);
> -	if (!fobj || (fobj->shared_count == 0)) {
> -		fence = dma_resv_excl_fence(obj->resv);
> -		/* don't need to wait on our own fences, since ring is fifo */
> -		if (fence && (fence->context != fctx->context)) {
> -			ret = dma_fence_wait(fence, true);
> -			if (ret)
> -				return ret;
> -		}
> +	fence = dma_resv_excl_fence(obj->resv);
> +	/* don't need to wait on our own fences, since ring is fifo */
> +	if (fence && (fence->context != fctx->context)) {
> +		ret = dma_fence_wait(fence, true);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
>   	}
>   
> +	fobj = dma_resv_shared_list(obj->resv);
>   	if (!exclusive || !fobj)
>   		return 0;
>   


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Sean Paul" <sean@poorly.run>,
	"Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/20] drm/msm: always wait for the exclusive fence
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 10:48:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2582129c-b0c3-831c-a3b4-caa51be95095@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210708173754.3877540-17-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Am 08.07.21 um 19:37 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
>
> Drivers also need to to sync to the exclusive fence when
> a shared one is present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> [danvet: Not that hard to compile-test on arm ...]
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
> Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
> Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org

Wondering a bit why you have that in this patch set now.

But any objections that we push this now?

Thanks,
Christian.

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c | 16 +++++++---------
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> index 141178754231..d9c4f1deeafb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> @@ -812,17 +812,15 @@ int msm_gem_sync_object(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
>   	struct dma_fence *fence;
>   	int i, ret;
>   
> -	fobj = dma_resv_shared_list(obj->resv);
> -	if (!fobj || (fobj->shared_count == 0)) {
> -		fence = dma_resv_excl_fence(obj->resv);
> -		/* don't need to wait on our own fences, since ring is fifo */
> -		if (fence && (fence->context != fctx->context)) {
> -			ret = dma_fence_wait(fence, true);
> -			if (ret)
> -				return ret;
> -		}
> +	fence = dma_resv_excl_fence(obj->resv);
> +	/* don't need to wait on our own fences, since ring is fifo */
> +	if (fence && (fence->context != fctx->context)) {
> +		ret = dma_fence_wait(fence, true);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
>   	}
>   
> +	fobj = dma_resv_shared_list(obj->resv);
>   	if (!exclusive || !fobj)
>   		return 0;
>   


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 16/20] drm/msm: always wait for the exclusive fence
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 10:48:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2582129c-b0c3-831c-a3b4-caa51be95095@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210708173754.3877540-17-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Am 08.07.21 um 19:37 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
>
> Drivers also need to to sync to the exclusive fence when
> a shared one is present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> [danvet: Not that hard to compile-test on arm ...]
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
> Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
> Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org

Wondering a bit why you have that in this patch set now.

But any objections that we push this now?

Thanks,
Christian.

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c | 16 +++++++---------
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> index 141178754231..d9c4f1deeafb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> @@ -812,17 +812,15 @@ int msm_gem_sync_object(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
>   	struct dma_fence *fence;
>   	int i, ret;
>   
> -	fobj = dma_resv_shared_list(obj->resv);
> -	if (!fobj || (fobj->shared_count == 0)) {
> -		fence = dma_resv_excl_fence(obj->resv);
> -		/* don't need to wait on our own fences, since ring is fifo */
> -		if (fence && (fence->context != fctx->context)) {
> -			ret = dma_fence_wait(fence, true);
> -			if (ret)
> -				return ret;
> -		}
> +	fence = dma_resv_excl_fence(obj->resv);
> +	/* don't need to wait on our own fences, since ring is fifo */
> +	if (fence && (fence->context != fctx->context)) {
> +		ret = dma_fence_wait(fence, true);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
>   	}
>   
> +	fobj = dma_resv_shared_list(obj->resv);
>   	if (!exclusive || !fobj)
>   		return 0;
>   

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-09  8:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-08 17:37 [PATCH v3 00/20] drm/sched dependency tracking and dma-resv fixes Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 01/20] drm/sched: entity->rq selection cannot fail Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-09  6:53   ` Christian König
2021-07-09  6:53     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-07-09  7:14     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-09  7:14       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-09  7:23       ` Christian König
2021-07-09  7:23         ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-07-09  8:00         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-09  8:00           ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-09  8:11           ` Christian König
2021-07-09  8:11             ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 02/20] drm/sched: Split drm_sched_job_init Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 03/20] drm/sched: Barriers are needed for entity->last_scheduled Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 18:56   ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2021-07-08 18:56     ` [Intel-gfx] " Andrey Grodzovsky
2021-07-08 19:53     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 19:53       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 21:54   ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 21:54     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-09  6:57     ` Christian König
2021-07-09  6:57       ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-07-09  7:40       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-09  7:40         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 04/20] drm/sched: Add dependency tracking Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 05/20] drm/sched: drop entity parameter from drm_sched_push_job Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 06/20] drm/sched: improve docs around drm_sched_entity Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 07/20] drm/panfrost: use scheduler dependency tracking Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12  9:19   ` Steven Price
2021-07-12  9:19     ` [Intel-gfx] " Steven Price
2021-07-12  9:19     ` Steven Price
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 08/20] drm/lima: " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 09/20] drm/v3d: Move drm_sched_job_init to v3d_job_init Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 10/20] drm/v3d: Use scheduler dependency handling Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 11/20] drm/etnaviv: " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 12/20] drm/gem: Delete gem array fencing helpers Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 13/20] drm/sched: Don't store self-dependencies Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 14/20] drm/sched: Check locking in drm_sched_job_await_implicit Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 15/20] drm/msm: Don't break exclusive fence ordering Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 16/20] drm/msm: always wait for the exclusive fence Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-09  8:48   ` Christian König [this message]
2021-07-09  8:48     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-07-09  8:48     ` Christian König
2021-07-09  9:15     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-09  9:15       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-09  9:15       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 17/20] drm/etnaviv: Don't break exclusive fence ordering Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 18/20] drm/i915: delete exclude argument from i915_sw_fence_await_reservation Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 19/20] drm/i915: Don't break exclusive fence ordering Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 20/20] dma-resv: Give the docs a do-over Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-08 17:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-09  0:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/sched dependency tracking and dma-resv fixes (rev2) Patchwork
2021-07-09  0:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-09 15:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2582129c-b0c3-831c-a3b4-caa51be95095@gmail.com \
    --to=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.