From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56034C433E1 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:16:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D8552071A; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:16:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="jfOiHkJ1"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="iwDfxMIP" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1D8552071A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwJfh-0005j8-Bb; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:16:37 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwJff-0005j0-Pn for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:16:35 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:CC:To:References:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=g91rAVltbz9uHojaFxejkDZnfEx29vpsXkQtMdg7ayA=; b=jfOiHkJ1SYr/EtMJQJqx1hVbVd mffE/J9lXVOGvs53o/k2XeF9BGzeaajX6JKXdBjt/KtT4yzBSTYraOVZ3nmGuD1sUVKTBwM0Lq+iC wFetG4dDSroP605dMY8SyKqVVfv1X8LENRq7DR11emdjEvHZsw3LFli9srRV97Iw/BU4=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:CC:To:References:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=g91rAVltbz9uHojaFxejkDZnfEx29vpsXkQtMdg7ayA=; b=iwDfxMIPJBbZzeYRn2+L53VQ80 js0g8bRf0J+Bq9ZeAgs+EBfqCcUlXIBbwzTP08IyVUzpe14vFoUQN4NHgcf8f3B/BtfaD1dijfa/V 4KYDWHYfC56xQvkDWzGMoDtdiZgsEgXNQLwxGMFgeyn2Z7Hgy4nM0PGkHaG0Ae0cgl6w=; Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35] helo=huawei.com) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1jwJfd-00Bb6P-Pj for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:16:35 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS409-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id D9C2C45181C9146E3F82; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 14:16:15 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 14:16:14 +0800 References: To: Eric Biggers From: Chao Yu X-Forwarded-Message-Id: Message-ID: <25bb20b5-e628-8807-d4ec-d05d77607a69@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 14:16:13 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1jwJfd-00Bb6P-Pj Subject: [f2fs-dev] Fwd: [Bug 208565] There may be dead lock for cp_rwsem during checkpoint X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Hi Eric, Could you please help to test Jaegeak's patch with generic/204 testcase to see whether there is a regression? -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [f2fs-dev] [Bug 208565] There may be dead lock for cp_rwsem during checkpoint Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 02:26:47 +0000 From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org To: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208565 --- Comment #4 from Chao Yu (chao@kernel.org) --- Passed, we should ask Eric to retest in his enviornment, to make sure there is actually no regression. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel . _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel