From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753335AbaETNGX (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 20 May 2014 09:06:23 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34431 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752448AbaETNGV (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 20 May 2014 09:06:21 -0400
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley
	Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United
	Kingdom.
	Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140508135852.605324173@infradead.org>
References: <20140508135852.605324173@infradead.org> <20140508135840.956784204@infradead.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
        paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
        Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/20] arch,mn10300: Fold atomic_ops
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 14:05:32 +0100
Message-ID: <26031.1400591132@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> +#define ATOMIC_OPS(op) ATOMIC_OP(op) ATOMIC_OP_RETURN(op)

Can ATOMIC_OP() just be an alias for ATOMIC_OP_RETURN() where that is
appropriate?  I suspect several arches (MN10300 included) are going to return
the value *anyway*.

David