From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from packetmixer.de ([2001:4d88:2000:24::c0de] helo=mail.mail.packetmixer.de) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1dQsXo-0002go-Rx for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 09:48:59 +0000 From: Simon Wunderlich Subject: Re: Is using 802.11s with DFS possible? Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 11:48:29 +0200 Message-ID: <2614300.ercbpO68rJ@prime> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4297851611517292067==" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Chun-Yeow Yeoh Cc: Zach Sherin , benjamin@sipsolutions.net, "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" , Peter Oh --===============4297851611517292067== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2977437.IJzX4yts1A"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --nextPart2977437.IJzX4yts1A Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Friday, June 30, 2017 12:08:51 PM CEST Chun-Yeow Yeoh wrote: > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 1:53 AM, Peter Oh wrote: > > On 06/28/2017 06:54 PM, Zach Sherin wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I've been running some experiments in LEDE thanks to your help many > >> months ago, and I want to use DFS frequencies with my mesh network. > >> Does ath10k currently support this or am I up a creek? My tests show > >> that I can use DFS frequencies with AP mode but have always failed > >> when I use them in a mesh, such that the interface won't even start. > >> > >> Any suggestions? > > > > As far as I know, no DFS channels enabled in mesh mode at this moment. > > To support DFS channels in mesh mode, wpa_supplicant and mac80211 changes > > are required. > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg162307.html > Simon and Benjamin have submitted the above patches and some of them > has upstream to mac80211-next. > > Perhaps, Simon and Benjamin can comment on this. Our mac80211 patches have been upstreamed. However, the (experimental) wpa_supplicant patches have not been adopted and I've reworked them a little but they are not in a state to resubmit yet. So I don't expect the wpa_supplicant portion to work yet, and you also may need to think of a good way to have the mesh peers on a channel succession order. Cheers, Simon --nextPart2977437.IJzX4yts1A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE1ilQI7G+y+fdhnrfoSvjmEKSnqEFAllWHm0ACgkQoSvjmEKS nqGdeQ/+MCNEB6Z5yXEEIZlE7eECmJuIBwtLCU+zc0mlKXmiVocOATym+BInO2wl mnHp7amlHO2eSt8/VV6yTEi25ULwmT78+9OfpGSFnFLFKstLhjcCcew5/qGnAId8 Vp7ExsBpcpXJLV3q2r0MkfPtOn02koiyUV1Km68Beh03R6Y4CZxErKI8rGhwZPon XqgCowNk8TaOmC2R5OOQbLsux3hIMUmPUigixLK0diyRoVFSw3YBDCALXq/EyO7P Uy68ZluKLDw+s73AoigD5BMCvOS/pCd/CNYGO3X+emOdoMNWhnlha8OVOfxFH+Sh 0Cdhh5tu7o7zdkUGu6RkgaBNltxM2vYDS+Dt3Te41ZcxoE5xd7Ee27gAJ05Xn63Q 84K26HBzSX4C904TcoDiWXL1l/cdUvjdizxUl+UHu/2nid3tNFefbOqojLBLnYiB 7wGevxr8dY4cETOvOGHDFhSNoFoy+bUfU9JpeUAv4Gb8kVn7h1kBVG0F9MD1C1Oi PLkQz3imBjTTmED7vqCNKxYANsen5uCkuBzy8Rayhw+97cSjyIQWKbb/SbXZ9c1+ DvTKZNe1xEflgBv9yV4Ex5IU7ToXdD+k6Jt9T5sMiqHNj7J6Eofzp1/Dp0ZaC8YT a9U6jcTA7jm1pfQk9vtdj/jQK1S1vIBFI9CXQpHE0pxOAX0vU18= =//CR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2977437.IJzX4yts1A-- --===============4297851611517292067== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k --===============4297851611517292067==--