From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932984AbdC2V0m (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:26:42 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:51811 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932673AbdC2V0c (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:26:32 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot , smuckle.linux@gmail.com, juri.lelli@arm.com, Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@arm.com, eas-dev@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [RFC 2/9] irq_work: add irq_work_queue_on for !CONFIG_SMP Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 23:20:48 +0200 Message-ID: <2627152.ptA2OSn8Sr@aspire.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.10.0+; KDE/4.14.9; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <85403db254e26655d608137d7df49ebf3aade0c3.1489058244.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> References: <85403db254e26655d608137d7df49ebf3aade0c3.1489058244.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, March 09, 2017 05:15:12 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > From: Steve Muckle > > Having irq_work_queue_on() available for !CONFIG_SMP can make some > call sites cleaner. > > Signed-off-by: Steve Muckle > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > --- > include/linux/irq_work.h | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/irq_work.h b/include/linux/irq_work.h > index 47b9ebd4a74f..0195c3502d6b 100644 > --- a/include/linux/irq_work.h > +++ b/include/linux/irq_work.h > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ > #ifndef _LINUX_IRQ_WORK_H > #define _LINUX_IRQ_WORK_H > > +#include > #include > > /* > @@ -36,6 +37,12 @@ bool irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work); > > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP > bool irq_work_queue_on(struct irq_work *work, int cpu); > +#else > +static inline bool irq_work_queue_on(struct irq_work *work, int cpu) > +{ > + BUG_ON(cpu != 0); Would WARN_ON(), or WARN_ON_ONCE() even, be insufficient? > + return irq_work_queue(work); > +} > #endif > > void irq_work_tick(void); > Thanks, Rafael