Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] mk: add sensible default target with defconfig

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>]

04/08/2017 10:22, Hunt, David:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] 
> 07/06/2017 16:37, David Hunt:
> > Users can now use 'make defconfig' to generate a configuration using 
> > the most appropriate defaults for the current machine.
> > 
> > <arch-machine-execenv-toolchain>
> >   arch taken from uname -m
> >   machine defaults to native
> >   execenv is taken from uname, Linux=linuxapp, otherwise bsdapp
> >   toolchain is taken from $CC -v to see which compiler to use
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
> 
> Looks to be a good idea if it is really automatic.
> 
> > +                ${CC} -v 2>&1 | \
> > +                grep " version " | cut -d ' ' -f 1)
> 
> Unfortunately, it depends on $CC which is not commonly exported.
> What about defaulting to gcc?
> 
> > -	@echo "Configuration done"
> > +	@echo "Configuration done using "$(shell basename \
> > +		$(RTE_CONFIG_TEMPLATE) | sed "s/defconfig_//g")
> 
> RTE_CONFIG_TEMPLATE is not defined in this patch (and I do not see the benefit in next patch).
> 
> Thomas, 
>      Does this mean that this patch is not going into this release? It has been acked for almost a month now, with no further comment. The one hour between your comment and the release of RC4 did not give me a reasonable amount of time to address your concerns. I also feel that the lack of comments in the last month should mean that the patch should be applied as is. If changes are required, I am happy to address in the next release. 

You're right, I'm very sorry not taking time to review it before.
I think only the first patch should be integrated, without the comment for
RTE_CONFIG_TEMPLATE.
Opinion?