From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51386 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754563AbdC1Ir0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 04:47:26 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20170328062825.GA11567@infradead.org> References: <20170328062825.GA11567@infradead.org> <20170327164628.GA15147@infradead.org> <20170327154003.GA5716@birch.djwong.org> <20170307050140.GA12946@infradead.org> <20170307000609.GG5280@birch.djwong.org> <10435.1488907375@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20170324205322.GA4986@gmail.com> <23715.1490631926@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <23003.1490660007@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, "Darrick J. Wong" , Andreas Dilger , Eric Biggers , "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" , linux-fsdevel , xfs Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add initial batch of statx() LTP tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <26587.1490689414.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:23:34 +0100 Message-ID: <26588.1490689414@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Christoph Hellwig wrote: > ltp is a trainwreck. Please send xfstests test like for all other file > system functionality. You're really trying to make it as hard as > possible for fs developers, don't you? Sorry, Christoph, but, in my opinion, xfstests is in worse shape than LTP. It's not self-contained (the code to make statx available seems to have to be added to xfsprogs) and it's practically undocumented. LTP, on the other hand, is pretty easy to modify. David