[PATCH 17/20] ppc4xx_sdram: Use hwaddr for memory bank size

[BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>]

This resolves the target_ulong dependency that's clearly wrong and was
also noted in a fixme comment.

Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
---
 hw/ppc/ppc4xx_sdram.c | 14 ++++----------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/ppc/ppc4xx_sdram.c b/hw/ppc/ppc4xx_sdram.c
index 8683207179..69b670737f 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/ppc4xx_sdram.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/ppc4xx_sdram.c
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@
 #include "qapi/error.h"
 #include "qemu/log.h"
 #include "exec/address-spaces.h" /* get_system_memory() */
-#include "exec/cpu-defs.h" /* target_ulong */
 #include "hw/irq.h"
 #include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
 #include "qapi/error.h"
@@ -122,11 +121,6 @@ static void sdram_bank_unmap(Ppc4xxSdramBank *bank)
 
 /*****************************************************************************/
 /* DDR SDRAM controller */
-/*
- * XXX: TOFIX: some patches have made this code become inconsistent:
- *      there are type inconsistencies, mixing hwaddr, target_ulong
- *      and uint32_t
- */
 static uint32_t sdram_ddr_bcr(hwaddr ram_base, hwaddr ram_size)
 {
     uint32_t bcr;
@@ -170,9 +164,9 @@ static inline hwaddr sdram_ddr_base(uint32_t bcr)
     return bcr & 0xFF800000;
 }
 
-static target_ulong sdram_ddr_size(uint32_t bcr)
+static hwaddr sdram_ddr_size(uint32_t bcr)
 {
-    target_ulong size;
+    hwaddr size;
     int sh;
 
     sh = (bcr >> 17) & 0x7;
@@ -513,9 +507,9 @@ static inline hwaddr sdram_ddr2_base(uint32_t bcr)
     return (bcr & 0xffe00000) << 2;
 }
 
-static uint64_t sdram_ddr2_size(uint32_t bcr)
+static hwaddr sdram_ddr2_size(uint32_t bcr)
 {
-    uint64_t size;
+    hwaddr size;
     int sh;
 
     sh = 1024 - ((bcr >> 6) & 0x3ff);
-- 
2.30.4