From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934404AbdCJXUt (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:20:49 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f68.google.com ([74.125.83.68]:34374 "EHLO mail-pg0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932731AbdCJXUj (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:20:39 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/39] i.MX Media Driver To: Russell King - ARM Linux References: <1489121599-23206-1-git-send-email-steve_longerbeam@mentor.com> <20170310201356.GA21222@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, fabio.estevam@nxp.com, mchehab@kernel.org, hverkuil@xs4all.nl, nick@shmanahar.org, markus.heiser@darmarIT.de, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com, bparrot@ti.com, geert@linux-m68k.org, arnd@arndb.de, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, minghsiu.tsai@mediatek.com, tiffany.lin@mediatek.com, jean-christophe.trotin@st.com, horms+renesas@verge.net.au, niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se, robert.jarzmik@free.fr, songjun.wu@microchip.com, andrew-ct.chen@mediatek.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, pavel@ucw.cz, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Steve Longerbeam From: Steve Longerbeam Message-ID: <26d4a31f-f9d3-8b2b-391e-fc4b44cc8e5d@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:20:34 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170310201356.GA21222@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/10/2017 12:13 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Version 5 gives me no v4l2 controls exposed through the video device > interface. > > Just like with version 4, version 5 is completely useless with IMX219: > > imx6-mipi-csi2: LP-11 timeout, phy_state = 0x00000200 > ipu1_csi0: pipeline start failed with -110 > imx6-mipi-csi2: LP-11 timeout, phy_state = 0x00000200 > ipu1_csi0: pipeline start failed with -110 > imx6-mipi-csi2: LP-11 timeout, phy_state = 0x00000200 > ipu1_csi0: pipeline start failed with -110 > > So, like v4, I can't do any further testing. > Is the imx219 placing the csi-2 bus in LP-11 state on exit from s_power(ON)? I realize that probably means bringing the chip up to a completely operational state and then setting it to stream OFF in the s_power() op. The same had to be done for the OV5640. Steve From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Longerbeam Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/39] i.MX Media Driver Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:20:34 -0800 Message-ID: <26d4a31f-f9d3-8b2b-391e-fc4b44cc8e5d@gmail.com> References: <1489121599-23206-1-git-send-email-steve_longerbeam@mentor.com> <20170310201356.GA21222@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170310201356.GA21222@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org Sender: "devel" To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, andrew-ct.chen@mediatek.com, minghsiu.tsai@mediatek.com, sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, nick@shmanahar.org, songjun.wu@microchip.com, hverkuil@xs4all.nl, Steve Longerbeam , pavel@ucw.cz, robert.jarzmik@free.fr, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, markus.heiser@darmarIT.de, laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com, shuah@kernel.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, arnd@arndb.de, mchehab@kernel.org, bparrot@ti.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, horms+renesas@verge.net.au, tiffany.lin@mediatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jean-christophe.trotin@st.com, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, fabio.estevam@nxp.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 03/10/2017 12:13 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Version 5 gives me no v4l2 controls exposed through the video device > interface. > > Just like with version 4, version 5 is completely useless with IMX219: > > imx6-mipi-csi2: LP-11 timeout, phy_state = 0x00000200 > ipu1_csi0: pipeline start failed with -110 > imx6-mipi-csi2: LP-11 timeout, phy_state = 0x00000200 > ipu1_csi0: pipeline start failed with -110 > imx6-mipi-csi2: LP-11 timeout, phy_state = 0x00000200 > ipu1_csi0: pipeline start failed with -110 > > So, like v4, I can't do any further testing. > Is the imx219 placing the csi-2 bus in LP-11 state on exit from s_power(ON)? I realize that probably means bringing the chip up to a completely operational state and then setting it to stream OFF in the s_power() op. The same had to be done for the OV5640. Steve From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: slongerbeam@gmail.com (Steve Longerbeam) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:20:34 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v5 00/39] i.MX Media Driver In-Reply-To: <20170310201356.GA21222@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> References: <1489121599-23206-1-git-send-email-steve_longerbeam@mentor.com> <20170310201356.GA21222@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> Message-ID: <26d4a31f-f9d3-8b2b-391e-fc4b44cc8e5d@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/10/2017 12:13 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Version 5 gives me no v4l2 controls exposed through the video device > interface. > > Just like with version 4, version 5 is completely useless with IMX219: > > imx6-mipi-csi2: LP-11 timeout, phy_state = 0x00000200 > ipu1_csi0: pipeline start failed with -110 > imx6-mipi-csi2: LP-11 timeout, phy_state = 0x00000200 > ipu1_csi0: pipeline start failed with -110 > imx6-mipi-csi2: LP-11 timeout, phy_state = 0x00000200 > ipu1_csi0: pipeline start failed with -110 > > So, like v4, I can't do any further testing. > Is the imx219 placing the csi-2 bus in LP-11 state on exit from s_power(ON)? I realize that probably means bringing the chip up to a completely operational state and then setting it to stream OFF in the s_power() op. The same had to be done for the OV5640. Steve