From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1422C3524D for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 09:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6752070A for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 09:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727618AbgBCJKT (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Feb 2020 04:10:19 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:3156 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727611AbgBCJKS (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Feb 2020 04:10:18 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 01397Rsr076052 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 04:10:18 -0500 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2xxehnbwmm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 04:10:17 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 09:10:15 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 3 Feb 2020 09:10:13 -0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 0139ACD732505864 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 3 Feb 2020 09:10:12 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E447AE059; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 09:10:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994B0AE045; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 09:10:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.102.20.99]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 09:10:10 +0000 (GMT) From: Chandan Rajendra To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: agfl and related cleanups Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 14:42:52 +0530 Organization: IBM In-Reply-To: <20200130133343.225818-1-hch@lst.de> References: <20200130133343.225818-1-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20020309-0020-0000-0000-000003A67EEF X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20020309-0021-0000-0000-000021FE3EEB Message-Id: <2707889.gtkk1GV9Bd@localhost.localdomain> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.572 definitions=2020-02-03_02:2020-02-02,2020-02-03 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=705 phishscore=0 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1911200001 definitions=main-2002030073 Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, January 30, 2020 7:03 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi all, > > patch 1 is the interesting one that changes the struct agfl definition > so that we avoid warnings from new gcc versions about taking the address > of a member of a packed structure. The rest is random cleanups in > related areas. The changes look good to me, Reviewed-by: Chandan Rajendra -- chandan