All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
To: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>,
	Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>, "axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Bail out iteration functions upon SIGKILL.
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 23:47:34 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <272e3542-72ab-12ff-636b-722a68a2589c@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR04MB58165EC2C792CE26AAAF361FE7770@BYAPR04MB5816.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On 2019/11/12 13:05, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2019/11/08 20:54, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>> syzbot found that a thread can stall for minutes inside fallocate()
>> after that thread was killed by SIGKILL [1]. While trying to allocate
>> 64TB of disk space using fallocate() is legal, delaying termination of
>> killed thread for minutes is bad. Thus, allow iteration functions in
>> block/blk-lib.c to be killable.
>>
>> [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9386d051e11e09973d5a4cf79af5e8cedf79386d
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
>> Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+b48daca8639150bc5e73@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
>> ---
>>  block/blk-lib.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
>> index 5f2c429..6ca7cae 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-lib.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-lib.c
>> @@ -7,9 +7,22 @@
>>  #include <linux/bio.h>
>>  #include <linux/blkdev.h>
>>  #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
>> +#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
>>  
>>  #include "blk.h"
>>  
>> +static int blk_should_abort(struct bio *bio)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	cond_resched();
>> +	if (!fatal_signal_pending(current))
>> +		return 0;
>> +	ret = submit_bio_wait(bio);
> 
> This will change the behavior of __blkdev_issue_discard() to a sync IO
> execution instead of the current async execution since submit_bio_wait()
> call is the responsibility of the caller (e.g. blkdev_issue_discard()).
> Have you checked if users of __blkdev_issue_discard() are OK with that ?
> f2fs, ext4, xfs, dm and nvme use this function.

I'm not sure...

> 
> Looking at f2fs, this does not look like it is going to work as expected
> since the bio setup, including end_io callback, is done after this
> function is called and a regular submit_bio() execution is being used.

Then, just breaking the iteration like below?
nvmet_bdev_execute_write_zeroes() ignores -EINTR if "*biop = bio;" is done. Is that no problem?

--- a/block/blk-lib.c
+++ b/block/blk-lib.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 #include <linux/bio.h>
 #include <linux/blkdev.h>
 #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
+#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
 
 #include "blk.h"
 
@@ -30,6 +31,7 @@ int __blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 	struct bio *bio = *biop;
 	unsigned int op;
 	sector_t bs_mask;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (!q)
 		return -ENXIO;
@@ -76,10 +78,14 @@ int __blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 		 * is disabled.
 		 */
 		cond_resched();
+		if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
+			ret = -EINTR;
+			break;
+		}
 	}
 
 	*biop = bio;
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__blkdev_issue_discard);
 
@@ -136,6 +142,7 @@ static int __blkdev_issue_write_same(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 	unsigned int max_write_same_sectors;
 	struct bio *bio = *biop;
 	sector_t bs_mask;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (!q)
 		return -ENXIO;
@@ -172,10 +179,14 @@ static int __blkdev_issue_write_same(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 			nr_sects = 0;
 		}
 		cond_resched();
+		if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
+			ret = -EINTR;
+			break;
+		}
 	}
 
 	*biop = bio;
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -216,6 +227,7 @@ static int __blkdev_issue_write_zeroes(struct block_device *bdev,
 	struct bio *bio = *biop;
 	unsigned int max_write_zeroes_sectors;
 	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (!q)
 		return -ENXIO;
@@ -246,10 +258,14 @@ static int __blkdev_issue_write_zeroes(struct block_device *bdev,
 			nr_sects = 0;
 		}
 		cond_resched();
+		if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
+			ret = -EINTR;
+			break;
+		}
 	}
 
 	*biop = bio;
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -273,6 +289,7 @@ static int __blkdev_issue_zero_pages(struct block_device *bdev,
 	struct bio *bio = *biop;
 	int bi_size = 0;
 	unsigned int sz;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (!q)
 		return -ENXIO;
@@ -296,10 +313,14 @@ static int __blkdev_issue_zero_pages(struct block_device *bdev,
 				break;
 		}
 		cond_resched();
+		if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
+			ret = -EINTR;
+			break;
+		}
 	}
 
 	*biop = bio;
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /**

> 
>> +	bio_put(bio);
>> +	return ret ? ret : -EINTR;
>> +}
>> +
>>  struct bio *blk_next_bio(struct bio *bio, unsigned int nr_pages, gfp_t gfp)
>>  {
>>  	struct bio *new = bio_alloc(gfp, nr_pages);

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-12 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-23  7:56 INFO: task syz-executor can't die for more than 143 seconds. (2) syzbot
2019-10-24 10:08 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-10-28  8:51   ` Bob Liu
2019-11-08 11:41     ` [PATCH] block: Bail out iteration functions upon SIGKILL Tetsuo Handa
2019-11-08 18:13       ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-11-08 22:18         ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-11-12  4:05       ` Damien Le Moal
2019-11-12 14:47         ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2019-11-13  1:54           ` Damien Le Moal
2019-11-13  6:55             ` Ming Lei
2019-11-13  7:11               ` Damien Le Moal
2019-11-13  7:49                 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-15 10:05             ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-11-18  0:02               ` Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=272e3542-72ab-12ff-636b-722a68a2589c@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bob.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.