From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/urgent] rcu: add rcu_access_pointer and rcu_dereference_protected
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:00:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27310.1270659627@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100407162620.GA11543@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> The new rcu_access_pointer() primitive is for the case where the pointer
> is be fetch and not dereferenced. This primitive may be used without
> protection, RCU or otherwise, due to the fact that it uses ACCESS_ONCE().
> ...
> +#define rcu_access_pointer(p, c) \
NAK. This shouldn't have the conditional parameter 'c'. Given that 'c' (by
analogy to rcu_dereference_check()) is there to describe the conditions under
which it's permitted to dereference the pointer, why is that relevant here?
What is it you're proving?
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-07 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-07 16:26 [PATCH tip/urgent] rcu: add rcu_access_pointer and rcu_dereference_protected Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-07 16:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-07 16:45 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-04-07 17:00 ` David Howells [this message]
2010-04-07 17:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-07 17:20 ` David Howells
2010-04-07 23:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-08 16:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-08 19:04 ` David Howells
2010-04-08 19:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27310.1270659627@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.