Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: mmc: correct pwrseq node names

["Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>]

Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2023, 09:17:12 CET schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 20/01/2023 10:38, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 20. Januar 2023, 09:57:22 CET schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> >> Node names should be generic and should not contain underscores.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-pwrseq-emmc.yaml   | 2 +-
> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-pwrseq-sd8787.yaml | 2 +-
> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-pwrseq-simple.yaml | 2 +-
> >>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-pwrseq-emmc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-pwrseq-emmc.yaml
> >> index 911a5996e099..588be73168fa 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-pwrseq-emmc.yaml
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-pwrseq-emmc.yaml
> >> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ additionalProperties: false
> >>  examples:
> >>    - |
> >>      #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> >> -    sdhci0_pwrseq {
> >> +    pwrseq {
> > 
> > [applicable for all 3 examples]
> > 
> > hmm, power-sequences are not necessarily tied to an address and I guess
> > it will be very much a common case to have multiple ones on a system.
> > 
> > So might it be better to follow other patterns (like leds) to number them
> > or suggest a "foo-pwrseq" / "pwrseq-foo"?
> 
> In such cases one can add number or descriptive suffix (pwrseq-0,
> pwrseq-foo), just like we do for regulators. However the examples have
> here only one node and in such case "pwrseq" is enough.

ok, when that is already part of the schema then all is fine :-)

Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>