From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com ([95.142.166.194]:36522 "EHLO perceval.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755548Ab2FYM5W (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:57:22 -0400 From: Laurent Pinchart To: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com Cc: Manjunath Hadli , LMML Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/13] davinci: vpif capture:Add power management support Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:57:23 +0200 Message-ID: <2777370.dWcj1X6j2h@avalon> In-Reply-To: <1340622455-10419-11-git-send-email-manjunath.hadli@ti.com> References: <1340622455-10419-1-git-send-email-manjunath.hadli@ti.com> <1340622455-10419-11-git-send-email-manjunath.hadli@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Manjunath, Thank you for the patch. On Monday 25 June 2012 16:37:32 Manjunath Hadli wrote: > Implement power management operations - suspend and resume as part of > dev_pm_ops for VPIF capture driver. > > Signed-off-by: Manjunath Hadli > Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar > --- > drivers/media/video/davinci/vpif_capture.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpif_capture.c > b/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpif_capture.c index 097e136..f1ee137 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpif_capture.c > +++ b/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpif_capture.c > @@ -2300,26 +2300,74 @@ static int vpif_remove(struct platform_device > *device) return 0; > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM > /** > * vpif_suspend: vpif device suspend > - * > - * TODO: Add suspend code here > */ > -static int > -vpif_suspend(struct device *dev) > +static int vpif_suspend(struct device *dev) > { > - return -1; > + > + struct common_obj *common; > + struct channel_obj *ch; > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < VPIF_CAPTURE_MAX_DEVICES; i++) { > + /* Get the pointer to the channel object */ > + ch = vpif_obj.dev[i]; > + common = &ch->common[VPIF_VIDEO_INDEX]; > + if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&common->lock)) > + return -ERESTARTSYS; As for the display driver, this should probably be replaced by mutex_lock(). > + if (ch->usrs && common->io_usrs) { > + /* Disable channel */ > + if (ch->channel_id == VPIF_CHANNEL0_VIDEO) { > + enable_channel0(0); > + channel0_intr_enable(0); > + } > + if (ch->channel_id == VPIF_CHANNEL1_VIDEO || > + common->started == 2) { > + enable_channel1(0); > + channel1_intr_enable(0); > + } > + } > + mutex_unlock(&common->lock); > + } > + > + return 0; > } > > -/** > +/* > * vpif_resume: vpif device suspend > - * > - * TODO: Add resume code here > */ > -static int > -vpif_resume(struct device *dev) > +static int vpif_resume(struct device *dev) > { > - return -1; > + struct common_obj *common; > + struct channel_obj *ch; > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < VPIF_CAPTURE_MAX_DEVICES; i++) { > + /* Get the pointer to the channel object */ > + ch = vpif_obj.dev[i]; > + common = &ch->common[VPIF_VIDEO_INDEX]; > + if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&common->lock)) > + return -ERESTARTSYS; > + > + if (ch->usrs && common->io_usrs) { > + /* Disable channel */ > + if (ch->channel_id == VPIF_CHANNEL0_VIDEO) { > + enable_channel0(1); > + channel0_intr_enable(1); > + } > + if (ch->channel_id == VPIF_CHANNEL1_VIDEO || > + common->started == 2) { > + enable_channel1(1); > + channel1_intr_enable(1); > + } > + } > + mutex_unlock(&common->lock); > + } > + > + return 0; > } > > static const struct dev_pm_ops vpif_dev_pm_ops = { > @@ -2327,11 +2375,16 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops vpif_dev_pm_ops = { > .resume = vpif_resume, > }; > > +#define vpif_pm_ops (&vpif_dev_pm_ops) > +#else > +#define vpif_pm_ops NULL > +#endif > + > static __refdata struct platform_driver vpif_driver = { > .driver = { > .name = "vpif_capture", > .owner = THIS_MODULE, > - .pm = &vpif_dev_pm_ops, > + .pm = vpif_pm_ops, > }, > .probe = vpif_probe, > .remove = vpif_remove, -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart