Synaptics i2c touchscreen driver

Synaptics i2c touchscreen driver

[Arce, Abraham]

Hi Greg,

I was watching your Android presentation gave at ELC 2010, in that, you have mention Synaptics i2c touchscreen driver. I've been trying to identify if Synaptics team has an upstreaming plan but still no clear information on this.

I have already requested this info but things are extremely quiet.

http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-input/msg11006.html

Any information will be highly appreciated...

Best Regards
Abraham

Re: Synaptics i2c touchscreen driver

[Greg KH]

On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 04:45:23PM -0500, Arce, Abraham wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> I was watching your Android presentation gave at ELC 2010, in that,
> you have mention Synaptics i2c touchscreen driver. I've been trying to
> identify if Synaptics team has an upstreaming plan but still no clear
> information on this.
> 
> I have already requested this info but things are extremely quiet.
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-input/msg11006.html
> 
> Any information will be highly appreciated...

Sorry, I don't have any information or know anything about this at all.

good luck,

greg k-h

Re: Synaptics i2c touchscreen driver

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 08:27:57AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 04:45:23PM -0500, Arce, Abraham wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > I was watching your Android presentation gave at ELC 2010, in that,
> > you have mention Synaptics i2c touchscreen driver. I've been trying to
> > identify if Synaptics team has an upstreaming plan but still no clear
> > information on this.
> > 
> > I have already requested this info but things are extremely quiet.
> > 
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-input/msg11006.html
> > 
> > Any information will be highly appreciated...
> 
> Sorry, I don't have any information or know anything about this at all.
> 

As far as I know [current] versions of Android use RMI3 touchscreens
which are older technology. Synaptics is trying to get their newer RMI4
driver merged and probably not that interested in RMI3 anymore.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

RE: Synaptics i2c touchscreen driver

[Arce, Abraham]

Hi,

> From: Dmitry Torokhov [mailto:dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com]
> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 08:27:57AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 04:45:23PM -0500, Arce, Abraham wrote:
> > >
> > > I was watching your Android presentation gave at ELC 2010, in that,
> > > you have mention Synaptics i2c touchscreen driver. I've been trying to
> > > identify if Synaptics team has an upstreaming plan but still no clear
> > > information on this.
> > >
> > > I have already requested this info but things are extremely quiet.
> > >
> > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-input/msg11006.html
> > >
> > > Any information will be highly appreciated...
> >
> > Sorry, I don't have any information or know anything about this at all.
> >
> 
> As far as I know [current] versions of Android use RMI3 touchscreens
> which are older technology. Synaptics is trying to get their newer RMI4
> driver merged and probably not that interested in RMI3 anymore.

Thanks Greg and Dmitry for all the info... it helped!

Christopher, Allie, William,

First, I am looking for more information on TM-01217 controller, I remember looking at some document saying that that this particular controller supports RMI4, is this correct?

Another question, it is about the final patch for touchscreens based on RMI4 protocol:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-input/msg10042.html

When are you planning to release the final patch for upstreaming? Any help that you may need from the community?

Best Regards
Abraham

RE: Synaptics i2c touchscreen driver

[William Manson]

Hi Abraham -

Yes - the TM1217 is an RMI4 based module [I just got an email from a f/w engineer confirming it is indeed RMI4].

We are currently working on submitting a new patch for our RMI4 based driver to add some functionality based on Dmitry Torokhov's request that we implement an RMI bus architecture. This is kind of a large change and we had hoped our current submission for our RMI4 driver would be added to the Kernel.org under a branch where every developer could access it and then we could add in the RMI bus architecture in a later patch. So it will take a while till we can make a new patch but I have no problem if you want to try the existing patch out.

Be aware that it is for building a modular driver and I believe Android kernel is not built around module support. The existing Android Touch Screen driver for our older RMI3 sensors is built as a monolithic driver in one single file. I'm not aware whether Froyo (Android 2.2) supports modules or not. So - if not then you may have to somehow merge the code into one file with one mod_init and one mod_exit.

As far as any help from the community - I for one would welcome it. Our goal is to have a very 'generic' RMI4 based driver that can have different physical layer modules plugged into it (I2C, SPI, PS/2, USB, etc.) and then also have support for multiple RMI4 modules with each RMI4 module supporting multiple functions (see our RMI4 spec. on our website - www.synaptics.com and go to Support/Developer Resource/Manuals - to get info about what RMI4 functions are currently defined). This modular approach is much more than a single driver for RMI4 that only supports one physical protocol like I2C and only supports "some" functions. To be frank, most people are mainly interested in just Function 0x11 (2D sensor - or the clear pad itself). But it would be possible to have multiple controllers wher
 e two of the controllers support 2D and one supports buttons and say yet another supports LEDs and buttons and maybe some custom GPIOs. So the much broader modular approach is better in the long run for overall "generic" RMI4 support.

Thanks,
William Manson



-----Original Message-----
From: Arce, Abraham [mailto:x0066660@ti.com]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 2:26 PM
To: Dmitry Torokhov; Greg KH; Christopher Heiny; Allie Xiong; William Manson
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org; linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Synaptics i2c touchscreen driver

Hi,

> From: Dmitry Torokhov [mailto:dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com]
> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 08:27:57AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 04:45:23PM -0500, Arce, Abraham wrote:
> > >
> > > I was watching your Android presentation gave at ELC 2010, in that,
> > > you have mention Synaptics i2c touchscreen driver. I've been trying to
> > > identify if Synaptics team has an upstreaming plan but still no clear
> > > information on this.
> > >
> > > I have already requested this info but things are extremely quiet.
> > >
> > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-input/msg11006.html
> > >
> > > Any information will be highly appreciated...
> >
> > Sorry, I don't have any information or know anything about this at all.
> >
>
> As far as I know [current] versions of Android use RMI3 touchscreens
> which are older technology. Synaptics is trying to get their newer RMI4
> driver merged and probably not that interested in RMI3 anymore.

Thanks Greg and Dmitry for all the info... it helped!

Christopher, Allie, William,

First, I am looking for more information on TM-01217 controller, I remember looking at some document saying that that this particular controller supports RMI4, is this correct?

Another question, it is about the final patch for touchscreens based on RMI4 protocol:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-input/msg10042.html

When are you planning to release the final patch for upstreaming? Any help that you may need from the community?

Best Regards
Abraham

Re: Synaptics i2c touchscreen driver

[Dmitry Torokhov]

Hi William,

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 05:26:15PM -0700, William Manson wrote:
> Hi Abraham -
> 
> Yes - the TM1217 is an RMI4 based module [I just got an email from a
> f/w engineer confirming it is indeed RMI4].
> 
> We are currently working on submitting a new patch for our RMI4 based
> driver to add some functionality based on Dmitry Torokhov's request
> that we implement an RMI bus architecture. This is kind of a large
> change and we had hoped our current submission for our RMI4 driver
> would be added to the Kernel.org under a branch where every developer
> could access it and then we could add in the RMI bus architecture in a
> later patch. So it will take a while till we can make a new patch but
> I have no problem if you want to try the existing patch out.

I have committed the latest version of the patch Christopher sent (sans
defconfig and gta01 platform changes that do not really belong there) to
synaptics-rmi4 branch of my tree on kernel.org. I branched it off 2.6.35
release so it should be reasonably usable.

I shall be accepting patches applicable to that branch and if other
community players (Arce and others) will have time to work on the driver
- that would be great.

Hope this helps.

-- 
Dmitry

RE: Synaptics i2c touchscreen driver

[William Manson]

Dmitry -

Thanks - yes this will help very much.

Thanks,
William Manson


-----Original Message-----
From: Dmitry Torokhov [mailto:dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 5:51 PM
To: William Manson
Cc: 'Arce, Abraham'; Greg KH; Christopher Heiny; Allie Xiong; devel@driverdev.osuosl.org; linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Synaptics i2c touchscreen driver

Hi William,

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 05:26:15PM -0700, William Manson wrote:
> Hi Abraham -
>
> Yes - the TM1217 is an RMI4 based module [I just got an email from a
> f/w engineer confirming it is indeed RMI4].
>
> We are currently working on submitting a new patch for our RMI4 based
> driver to add some functionality based on Dmitry Torokhov's request
> that we implement an RMI bus architecture. This is kind of a large
> change and we had hoped our current submission for our RMI4 driver
> would be added to the Kernel.org under a branch where every developer
> could access it and then we could add in the RMI bus architecture in a
> later patch. So it will take a while till we can make a new patch but
> I have no problem if you want to try the existing patch out.

I have committed the latest version of the patch Christopher sent (sans
defconfig and gta01 platform changes that do not really belong there) to
synaptics-rmi4 branch of my tree on kernel.org. I branched it off 2.6.35
release so it should be reasonably usable.

I shall be accepting patches applicable to that branch and if other
community players (Arce and others) will have time to work on the driver
- that would be great.

Hope this helps.

--
Dmitry

RE: Synaptics i2c touchscreen driver

[Arce, Abraham]

Hi,

> From: William Manson [mailto:WManson@synaptics.com]
> 
> Dmitry -
> 
> Thanks - yes this will help very much.
> 
> > >
> > > Yes - the TM1217 is an RMI4 based module [I just got an email from a
> > > f/w engineer confirming it is indeed RMI4].
> > >
> > > We are currently working on submitting a new patch for our RMI4 based
> > > driver to add some functionality based on Dmitry Torokhov's request
> > > that we implement an RMI bus architecture. This is kind of a large
> > > change and we had hoped our current submission for our RMI4 driver
> > > would be added to the Kernel.org under a branch where every developer
> > > could access it and then we could add in the RMI bus architecture in a
> > > later patch. So it will take a while till we can make a new patch but
> > > I have no problem if you want to try the existing patch out.
> 
> I have committed the latest version of the patch Christopher sent (sans
> defconfig and gta01 platform changes that do not really belong there) to
> synaptics-rmi4 branch of my tree on kernel.org. I branched it off 2.6.35
> release so it should be reasonably usable.
> 
> I shall be accepting patches applicable to that branch and if other
> community players (Arce and others) will have time to work on the driver
> - that would be great.
> 

I'll give a try the synaptics-rmi4 branch...

Thanks William and Dmitry for the quick response!

Best Regards
Abraham

Re: Synaptics i2c touchscreen driver

[Trilok Soni]

Hi Dmitry, William,

On 9/14/2010 6:20 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi William,
> 
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 05:26:15PM -0700, William Manson wrote:
>> Hi Abraham -
>>
>> Yes - the TM1217 is an RMI4 based module [I just got an email from a
>> f/w engineer confirming it is indeed RMI4].
>>
>> We are currently working on submitting a new patch for our RMI4 based
>> driver to add some functionality based on Dmitry Torokhov's request
>> that we implement an RMI bus architecture. This is kind of a large
>> change and we had hoped our current submission for our RMI4 driver
>> would be added to the Kernel.org under a branch where every developer
>> could access it and then we could add in the RMI bus architecture in a
>> later patch. So it will take a while till we can make a new patch but
>> I have no problem if you want to try the existing patch out.
> 
> I have committed the latest version of the patch Christopher sent (sans
> defconfig and gta01 platform changes that do not really belong there) to
> synaptics-rmi4 branch of my tree on kernel.org. I branched it off 2.6.35
> release so it should be reasonably usable.

Why don't you submit to drivers/staging instead of creating branch at Dmitry's GIT tree?

You can probably attract more developers and you don't need to rebase to latest kernel 
everytime.

---Trilok Soni

-- 
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

Re: Synaptics i2c touchscreen driver

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:58:38PM +0530, Trilok Soni wrote:
> Hi Dmitry, William,
> 
> On 9/14/2010 6:20 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi William,
> > 
> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 05:26:15PM -0700, William Manson wrote:
> >> Hi Abraham -
> >>
> >> Yes - the TM1217 is an RMI4 based module [I just got an email from a
> >> f/w engineer confirming it is indeed RMI4].
> >>
> >> We are currently working on submitting a new patch for our RMI4 based
> >> driver to add some functionality based on Dmitry Torokhov's request
> >> that we implement an RMI bus architecture. This is kind of a large
> >> change and we had hoped our current submission for our RMI4 driver
> >> would be added to the Kernel.org under a branch where every developer
> >> could access it and then we could add in the RMI bus architecture in a
> >> later patch. So it will take a while till we can make a new patch but
> >> I have no problem if you want to try the existing patch out.
> > 
> > I have committed the latest version of the patch Christopher sent (sans
> > defconfig and gta01 platform changes that do not really belong there) to
> > synaptics-rmi4 branch of my tree on kernel.org. I branched it off 2.6.35
> > release so it should be reasonably usable.
> 
> Why don't you submit to drivers/staging instead of creating branch at Dmitry's GIT tree?
> 
> You can probably attract more developers and you don't need to rebase to latest kernel 
> everytime.
> 

Since it is an input driver it is easier for me to apply patches to my
tree instead of routing through Greg. I intend to keep that ranch at
2.6.35 unless we have to rebase.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry