Re: [PATCH 4/6] ufs: Fix a race condition in the tracing code

[Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>]

On 12/25/19 2:59 AM, Can Guo wrote:
> On 2019-12-25 06:02, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> Starting execution of a command before tracing a command may cause the
>> completion handler to free data while it is being traced. Fix this race
>> by tracing a command before it is submitted.
>>
>> Cc: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
>> Cc: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
>> Cc: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
>> Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
>> Cc: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>> index 80b028ba39e9..4d9bb1932b39 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>> @@ -1875,12 +1875,12 @@ void ufshcd_send_command(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>> unsigned int task_tag)
>>  {
>>      hba->lrb[task_tag].issue_time_stamp = ktime_get();
>>      hba->lrb[task_tag].compl_time_stamp = ktime_set(0, 0);
>> +    ufshcd_add_command_trace(hba, task_tag, "send");
> 
> How about moving it after __set_bit(task_tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs);?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Can Guo.
> 
>>      ufshcd_clk_scaling_start_busy(hba);
>>      __set_bit(task_tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs);
>>      ufshcd_writel(hba, 1 << task_tag, REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_DOOR_BELL);
>>      /* Make sure that doorbell is committed immediately */
>>      wmb();
>> -    ufshcd_add_command_trace(hba, task_tag, "send");
>>  }

Hi Can,

As far as I can see ufshcd_add_command_trace() does not read 
hba->outstanding_reqs so calling ufshcd_add_command_trace() before 
changing outstanding_reqs should be fine.

The order chosen in the posted patch should minimize energy usage of the 
UFS controller, namely by calling the tracing function before starting 
clock scaling.

Thanks,

Bart.