All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
To: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Cc: "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	" Daniel P. Berrangé " <berrange@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, ct@flyingcircus.io, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	qemu-stable@nongnu.org, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Max Reitz" <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	"Jason Dillaman" <dillaman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block/rbd: fix handling of holes in .bdrv_co_block_status
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 22:27:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <28283639-9407-4651-A07F-B40712E509CC@kamp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOi1vP93pvs8tOxj_9RL=bUTxyvYhcOha_JEa39AtWcVcey2_A@mail.gmail.com>


> Am 12.01.2022 um 22:06 schrieb Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>:
> 
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 9:39 PM Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de> wrote:
>> 
>>> Am 12.01.22 um 10:05 schrieb Ilya Dryomov:
>>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:42 PM Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de> wrote:
>>>> the assumption that we can't hit a hole if we do not diff against a snapshot was wrong.
>>>> 
>>>> We can see a hole in an image if we diff against base if there exists an older snapshot
>>>> of the image and we have discarded blocks in the image where the snapshot has data.
>>>> 
>>>> Fixes: 0347a8fd4c3faaedf119be04c197804be40a384b
>>>> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
>>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
>>>> ---
>>>> block/rbd.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/block/rbd.c b/block/rbd.c
>>>> index def96292e0..5e9dc91d81 100644
>>>> --- a/block/rbd.c
>>>> +++ b/block/rbd.c
>>>> @@ -1279,13 +1279,24 @@ static int qemu_rbd_diff_iterate_cb(uint64_t offs, size_t len,
>>>>     RBDDiffIterateReq *req = opaque;
>>>> 
>>>>     assert(req->offs + req->bytes <= offs);
>>>> -    /*
>>>> -     * we do not diff against a snapshot so we should never receive a callback
>>>> -     * for a hole.
>>>> -     */
>>>> -    assert(exists);
>>>> 
>>>> -    if (!req->exists && offs > req->offs) {
>>>> +    if (req->exists && offs > req->offs + req->bytes) {
>>>> +        /*
>>>> +         * we started in an allocated area and jumped over an unallocated area,
>>>> +         * req->bytes contains the length of the allocated area before the
>>>> +         * unallocated area. stop further processing.
>>>> +         */
>>>> +        return QEMU_RBD_EXIT_DIFF_ITERATE2;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +    if (req->exists && !exists) {
>>>> +        /*
>>>> +         * we started in an allocated area and reached a hole. req->bytes
>>>> +         * contains the length of the allocated area before the hole.
>>>> +         * stop further processing.
>>>> +         */
>>>> +        return QEMU_RBD_EXIT_DIFF_ITERATE2;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +    if (!req->exists && exists && offs > req->offs) {
>>>>         /*
>>>>          * we started in an unallocated area and hit the first allocated
>>>>          * block. req->bytes must be set to the length of the unallocated area
>>>> @@ -1295,17 +1306,19 @@ static int qemu_rbd_diff_iterate_cb(uint64_t offs, size_t len,
>>>>         return QEMU_RBD_EXIT_DIFF_ITERATE2;
>>>>     }
>>>> 
>>>> -    if (req->exists && offs > req->offs + req->bytes) {
>>>> -        /*
>>>> -         * we started in an allocated area and jumped over an unallocated area,
>>>> -         * req->bytes contains the length of the allocated area before the
>>>> -         * unallocated area. stop further processing.
>>>> -         */
>>>> -        return QEMU_RBD_EXIT_DIFF_ITERATE2;
>>>> -    }
>>>> +    /*
>>>> +     * assert that we caught all cases above and allocation state has not
>>>> +     * changed during callbacks.
>>>> +     */
>>>> +    assert(exists == req->exists || !req->bytes);
>>>> +    req->exists = exists;
>>>> 
>>>> -    req->bytes += len;
>>>> -    req->exists = true;
>>>> +    /*
>>>> +     * assert that we either return an unallocated block or have got callbacks
>>>> +     * for all allocated blocks present.
>>>> +     */
>>>> +    assert(!req->exists || offs == req->offs + req->bytes);
>>>> +    req->bytes = offs + len - req->offs;
>>>> 
>>>>     return 0;
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -1354,13 +1367,13 @@ static int coroutine_fn qemu_rbd_co_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
>>>>     }
>>>>     assert(req.bytes <= bytes);
>>>>     if (!req.exists) {
>>>> -        if (r == 0) {
>>>> +        if (r == 0 && !req.bytes) {
>>>>             /*
>>>> -             * rbd_diff_iterate2 does not invoke callbacks for unallocated
>>>> -             * areas. This here catches the case where no callback was
>>>> -             * invoked at all (req.bytes == 0).
>>>> +             * rbd_diff_iterate2 does not invoke callbacks for unallocated areas
>>>> +             * except for the case where an overlay has a hole where the parent
>>>> +             * or an older snapshot of the image has not. This here catches the
>>>> +             * case where no callback was invoked at all.
>>>>              */
>>>> -            assert(req.bytes == 0);
>>>>             req.bytes = bytes;
>>>>         }
>>>>         status = BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO | BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID;
>>>> --
>>>> 2.25.1
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> Hi Peter,
>>> 
>>> Can we just skip these "holes" by replacing the existing assert with
>>> an if statement that would simply bail from the callback on !exists?
>>> 
>>> Just trying to keep the logic as simple as possible since as it turns
>>> out we get to contend with ages-old librbd bugs here...
>> 
>> 
>> I'm afraid I think this would not work. Consider qemu-img convert.
>> 
>> If we bail out we would immediately call get_block_status with the offset
>> 
>> where we stopped and hit the !exist again.
> 
> I'm suggesting bailing from the callback (i.e. return 0), not from the
> entire rbd_diff_iterate2() instance.  The iteration would move on and
> either stumble upon an allocated area within the requested range or run
> off the end of the requested range.  Both of these cases are already
> handled by the existing code.

Ah, got it. That’s a smart solution!

Peter




  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-12 21:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-10 11:41 [PATCH 0/2] block/rbd: fixes for bdrv_co_block_status Peter Lieven
2022-01-10 11:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] block/rbd: fix handling of holes in .bdrv_co_block_status Peter Lieven
2022-01-12  9:05   ` Ilya Dryomov
2022-01-12 20:39     ` Peter Lieven
2022-01-12 21:02       ` Ilya Dryomov
2022-01-12 21:27         ` Peter Lieven [this message]
2022-01-10 11:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] block/rbd: workaround for ceph issue #53784 Peter Lieven
2022-01-10 14:18   ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-01-11  9:10     ` Peter Lieven
2022-01-11 11:15       ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-01-12  9:59   ` Ilya Dryomov
2022-01-12 11:55     ` Peter Lieven
2022-01-12 12:22       ` Ilya Dryomov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=28283639-9407-4651-A07F-B40712E509CC@kamp.de \
    --to=pl@kamp.de \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ct@flyingcircus.io \
    --cc=dillaman@redhat.com \
    --cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.