From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=dell.com (client-ip=68.232.149.214; helo=esa4.dell-outbound.iphmx.com; envelope-from=eugene.cho@dell.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dell.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=dell.com header.i=@dell.com header.b="CDKuD1E4"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from esa4.dell-outbound.iphmx.com (esa4.dell-outbound.iphmx.com [68.232.149.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40hYP23BTtzF2C4 for ; Thu, 10 May 2018 23:05:24 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dell.com; i=@dell.com; q=dns/txt; s=smtpout; t=1525957526; x=1557493526; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=nrJQu3my8tuFUwdMOFGJehRZCq66ddfmDqeqcyiSYYo=; b=CDKuD1E4oAV9taQxgeHF97KljUtM3CIoAHcPFItha2+1D0ff4Bmtjjds TGJX63qO0qzE5j/T6y3a0im3kX0hup21pRyh32I9DjD+BYlQQNpDtp38L o3CUPOeCA0bAGOaC8GI5GKS8eONDoSnQMOspiB8ceDYNCAa+AL8MS13Te s=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2GqAgDJQvRahz+a6ERcHQEBBQELAYQWg?= =?us-ascii?q?QkymFaDCJNEgWQLhGyDAiE3FQECAQEBAQEBAgEBAhABAQEKCwkIKC+CNSKDARM?= =?us-ascii?q?/EgE+YQcBBA4NgxuBcBGsWDOHaF+CSIglghOIURpuhQgCmC0IjkeBL4s9kFKBJ?= =?us-ascii?q?TKBdXCDFIItjiCPCIEfgRgBAQ?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2GqAgDJQvRahz+a6ERcHQEBBQELAYQWgQkymFaDCJNEgWQ?= =?us-ascii?q?LhGyDAiE3FQECAQEBAQEBAgEBAhABAQEKCwkIKC+CNSKDARM/EgE+YQcBBA4Ng?= =?us-ascii?q?xuBcBGsWDOHaF+CSIglghOIURpuhQgCmC0IjkeBL4s9kFKBJTKBdXCDFIItjiC?= =?us-ascii?q?PCIEfgRgBAQ?= Received: from esa3.dell-outbound2.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.63]) by esa4.dell-outbound.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 May 2018 08:05:21 -0500 From: Received: from ausc60ps301.us.dell.com ([143.166.148.206]) by esa3.dell-outbound2.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 May 2018 19:02:30 +0600 X-LoopCount0: from 10.166.132.134 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,385,1520917200"; d="scan'208";a="1149309809" X-DLP: DLP_GlobalPCIDSS To: CC: Subject: common bmc mailbox driver Thread-Topic: common bmc mailbox driver Thread-Index: AdPoXuWSWf7y8INVQQa+TJMSn0fZ2w== Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 13:04:59 +0000 Message-ID: <28825ffd2af2405eacbb48f1388992f8@AUSX13MPC105.AMER.DELL.COM> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titusconfig: No Restrictions 04051212 x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvIiwiaWQiOiJiYWQ3MjQxYS0xOGIzLTQyNGUtOTIxZS1iZmM1ZWQwOTJjN2MiLCJwcm9wcyI6W3sibiI6IkNsYXNzaWZpY2F0aW9uIiwidmFscyI6W3sidmFsdWUiOiJObyBSZXN0cmljdGlvbnMifV19LHsibiI6IlN1YmxhYmVscyIsInZhbHMiOltdfSx7Im4iOiJFeHRlcm5hbENvcnJlc3BvbmRlbmNlIiwidmFscyI6W119XX0sIlN1YmplY3RMYWJlbHMiOltdLCJUTUNWZXJzaW9uIjoiMTYuMi4xMS4wIiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6InA4RFRZRmVWQ3d2aWRCdnZIUGRGXC81QUFSN01ySFphMzlWR1g4Rk8rVDlnPSJ9 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.143.242.75] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 13:05:28 -0000 Hey Cyril, I was recently following your upstream submission attempt for the aspeed= mbox/mailbox, was wondering if there was been any progress since? Reason I ask - is Nuvoton also has a "mailbox" for bmc<->host communication= , which does the same thing (shared memory + interrupts both ways), and was= wondering if we could just have 1 driver for both, instead 2 separate driv= ers. Glancing at the aspeed driver, only key difference I see is the setting and= handling the interrupt. Thoughts on this?