All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] block-copy: atomic .cancelled and .finished fields in BlockCopyCallState
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 12:36:49 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <28d4cd1c-2495-b30d-3c9f-2d8d0d3e897b@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c06306f6-e154-ec58-44cc-33d48d8ccdff@redhat.com>

22.06.2021 11:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 19/06/21 22:06, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>>
>>> -    assert(call_state->finished);
>>> +    assert(qatomic_load_acquire(&call_state->finished));
>>
>> Hmm. Here qatomic_load_acquire protects nothing (assertion will crash if not yet finished anyway). So, caller is double sure that block-copy is finished.
> 
> It does.  If it returns true, you still want the load of finished to happen before the reads that follow.
> 

Hmm.. The worst case if we use just qatomic_read is that assertion will not crash when it actually should. That doesn't break the logic. But that's not good anyway.

OK, I agree, let's keep it.

> Otherwise I agree with your remarks.
> 
> Paolo
> 
>> Also it's misleading: if we think that it do some protection, we are doing wrong thing: assertions may be simply compiled out, we can't rely on statements inside assert() to be executed.
>>
>> So, let's use simple qatomic_read here too.
>>
>>>       if (error_is_read) {
>>>           *error_is_read = call_state->error_is_read;
>>>       } 
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir


  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-22  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-14  7:33 [PATCH v4 0/6] block-copy: protect block-copy internal structures Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-14  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] block-copy: small refactor in block_copy_task_entry and block_copy_common Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-19 14:33   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-14  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] block-copy: streamline choice of copy_range vs. read/write Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-19 15:05   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-19 18:23   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-14  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] block-copy: improve comments of BlockCopyTask and BlockCopyState types and functions Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-19 15:23   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-19 18:31     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-21  8:13       ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-22  9:20         ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-21  7:59     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-22  9:16       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-19 17:27   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-21  8:21     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-19 18:53   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-21  8:28     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-14  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] block-copy: move progress_set_remaining in block_copy_task_end Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-14  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] block-copy: add a CoMutex Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-19 19:34   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-14  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] block-copy: atomic .cancelled and .finished fields in BlockCopyCallState Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-19 20:06   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-21  9:30     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-22  9:56       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-22  8:15     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-22  9:36       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy [this message]
2021-06-22 10:20         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-22 10:39           ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-22 20:57             ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-23 10:06             ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=28d4cd1c-2495-b30d-3c9f-2d8d0d3e897b@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=eesposit@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.