From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA05EC433E0 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 12:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1969C60233 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 12:26:20 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1969C60233 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=crudebyte.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:46950 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEWle-0003w3-Vo for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 07:26:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37948) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEWkr-0003OM-K0; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 07:25:29 -0500 Received: from kylie.crudebyte.com ([5.189.157.229]:36921) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEWko-0005w3-TV; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 07:25:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=crudebyte.com; s=kylie; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From: Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=KlIv50r98oKKKsTVCVEw7CfM8OA3Cr4XlAKZ5WYKFWs=; b=awYen3YLx2Rn56dWMV3KAOOpW+ WsI742/k7Y4IkJJMeOnlAVsm0PCfzvWWdU97rGZrNBbdD8B0m6WGjo8WNss1fspaE53qhyXshdxDj +c1GbCUEi5pnJwLrnmY4GgBOdxjB0ZaWLYYgXAYdf9PloVaIXirfhBBAqgiXhVIw/8QuEScCaD+wO X7MagLhCMHYvQgaK1bFBnv/YHachWvuYv4VWnlLIhIrTC1dwPzvkWzd5ej/H3g8wdGU69dWOl+3PD fTn66IQFmJZa7GqTI67Cj9u6rB4ru8W5ewOZa7M3qGl7pCIx0e9sQHCQINsS7/ZjzF8GhVBs86XSC IlQu2k88bZE5kQnQ1Lma+mC5Rh6PAoZ7Wo1dWThT6TiYs1mOTbCkZCK7c7uG4PK2rivnqERoQTNHU ZPdAfD0nDFj7l+bHBbjWd4mbbN//JZ7bdr7D9oi5n/cgZDnMW7oBRw/gXMN5+TvjF7MgPoqlvhaTV DEUtVu9pMJuCr7+jiTsddqEu+XP7hN71cvGJ4LsIX2z3QqBGzQnUzbu7WjTLQcyG6H+RqKPXGcs9k 2+jMF4u1/B+d9ovLQUt+MJnB4MVcx8R74oXVQVb72YZY2y/j6DlmMI3vy1C3y2RRNVLNabc+20zFx 7RVqD20RkWESdYhq92H9Yh5sjKxK/vWub/hCKK4dk=; From: Christian Schoenebeck To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Peter Maydell , Greg Kurz , Thomas Huth , Alexey Kardashevskiy , "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" , David Gibson Subject: Re: who's using the ozlabs patchwork install for QEMU patches ? Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 13:24:30 +0100 Message-ID: <2915273.dLz0rCdnKo@silver> In-Reply-To: References: <20210223123943.06d23a56@bahia.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.189.157.229; envelope-from=qemu_oss@crudebyte.com; helo=kylie.crudebyte.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Dienstag, 23. Februar 2021 12:54:47 CET Peter Maydell wrote: > On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 11:39, Greg Kurz wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:09:05 +0000 > > > > Peter Maydell wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 at 14:43, Greg Kurz wrote: > > > > My understanding is that users must be "maintainer" to edit other's > > > > patches. Only three 'maintainers' are currently listed at ozlabs for > > > > QEMU: > > > > > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/1.0/projects/14/ > > > > > > > > We had a discussion about that a few months back with Christian > > > > Schoenebeck > > > > (9pfs maintainer, Cc'd) who also uses patchworks. It turned out we > > > > didn't > > > > quite know how to go further because of lack of documentation, but I'd > > > > be > > > > glad to experiment the full patchwork experience if someone knows how > > > > to > > > > do it :-) > > > > > > If people want to try that kind of thing out I'm happy to try > > > to tweak their permissions on the patchwork instance. > > > > Please do for me then. My name is groug :) > > Hmm. Having looked through the UI and docs I can't figure > out how to do that (or even if 'maintainer' permission is > sufficient to add other maintainers; maybe one has to ask the > patchwork instance admins to do that?). If you can tell me what > I need to do to add you to the maintainer list for QEMU I'll do it :-) > > -- PMM We were looking into this last year, and from my (poor) understanding this is how it works: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-09/msg02864.html If somebody knows a more convenient/appropriate way, that would be appreciated. Best regards, Christian Schoenebeck