From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8 v2] arm: orion5x: Add DT-based support for Netgear WNR854T Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 23:13:33 +0200 Message-ID: <2920481.EgEQnLmOkM@wuerfel> References: <1472203264-21089-7-git-send-email-jm@lentin.co.uk> <1473109646-23366-1-git-send-email-jm@lentin.co.uk> <20160912170625.GA7420@rob-hp-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160912170625.GA7420@rob-hp-laptop> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Rob Herring Cc: Jamie Lentin , Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot , Jason Cooper , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Gregory Clement , Imre Kaloz , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Monday, September 12, 2016 12:06:25 PM CEST Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:07:26PM +0100, Jamie Lentin wrote: > > This is a router based on the mv88f5181 chipset. > > > > http://www.netgear.com/support/product/WNR854T.aspx > > http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/netgear/wnr854t > > > > Signed-off-by: Jamie Lentin > > --- > > This removes the contentious vendor partitioning scheme and goes back > > to the original partitioning scheme used in non-DT ports to this board. > > Using the same partitioning scheme should mean less surprises for > > someone trying to upgrade their router. > > > > The non-DT PCI setup is still here, as there are other orion5x DT boards > > doing very similar things, and can all be converted at the same time. > > If we keep accepting this duplicated, legacy PCI setup, who is going to > be motivated to clean things up. But it's ultimately up to Arnd and > Olof. > I mentioned before that I'm feeling a bit uneasy about this too. Maybe we can instead leave out the PCI support from the new file for now and not delete the legacy board file? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 23:13:33 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 6/8 v2] arm: orion5x: Add DT-based support for Netgear WNR854T In-Reply-To: <20160912170625.GA7420@rob-hp-laptop> References: <1472203264-21089-7-git-send-email-jm@lentin.co.uk> <1473109646-23366-1-git-send-email-jm@lentin.co.uk> <20160912170625.GA7420@rob-hp-laptop> Message-ID: <2920481.EgEQnLmOkM@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday, September 12, 2016 12:06:25 PM CEST Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:07:26PM +0100, Jamie Lentin wrote: > > This is a router based on the mv88f5181 chipset. > > > > http://www.netgear.com/support/product/WNR854T.aspx > > http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/netgear/wnr854t > > > > Signed-off-by: Jamie Lentin > > --- > > This removes the contentious vendor partitioning scheme and goes back > > to the original partitioning scheme used in non-DT ports to this board. > > Using the same partitioning scheme should mean less surprises for > > someone trying to upgrade their router. > > > > The non-DT PCI setup is still here, as there are other orion5x DT boards > > doing very similar things, and can all be converted at the same time. > > If we keep accepting this duplicated, legacy PCI setup, who is going to > be motivated to clean things up. But it's ultimately up to Arnd and > Olof. > I mentioned before that I'm feeling a bit uneasy about this too. Maybe we can instead leave out the PCI support from the new file for now and not delete the legacy board file? Arnd