From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from web37605.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.87.88]) by bombadil.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1NZxSC-0000Ls-Q3 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:16:28 +0000 Message-ID: <292166.19478.qm@web37605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:16:23 -0800 (PST) From: Alex Dubov Subject: Re: Legacy memstick support + FTL questions To: Maxim Levitsky In-Reply-To: <1264542237.15306.14.camel@maxim-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > =0A> Alex, I see that your PRO support is in kernel, not legacy=0A> suppo= rt=0A> isn't. Why?=0A=0AI had no time to finish debugging it on two control= lers I was trying to=0Acover in the same time (TI and Jmicron).=0A=0A> =0A>= Legacy MemSticks also are barebone like XD and thus need an=0A> FTL.=0A> H= owever, they don't have NAND interface.=0A> =0A=0ALegacy memorysticks are s= ort-of barebone. In general, they can be seen as=0AMTD targets if you take = into account that their oob field is actually a=0Aregister, not a directly = accessible memory.=0A=0A=0A=0A _______________________________________= ___________________________________________=0AYahoo!7: Catch-up on your fav= ourite Channel 7 TV shows easily, legally, and for free at PLUS7. www.tv.ya= hoo.com.au/plus7