From: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: sx150x: add a static gpio/pinctrl pin range mapping
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 09:19:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <292ad461-1976-84dc-6f08-92bb643bbfd3@axentia.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZfQkzcGW5dFwgg-b1G+R-323OO4nu3jpUkH=x6Ks+RaQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 2018-01-18 08:58, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> wrote:
>
>> Without such a range, gpiolib fails with -EPROBE_DEFER, pending the
>> addition of the range. So, without a range, gpiolib will keep
>> deferring indefinitely.
>>
>> Fixes: e10f72bf4b3e ("gpio: gpiolib: Generalise state persistence beyond sleep")
>> Suggested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
>
> Added the other Fixes: tag as well, add Cc: stable and applied.
>
> It will go in for the merge window as it is now, unless Torvalds
> decide to do an -rc9 in which case I will consider sending it as
> a separate fix next week.
I didn't (yet?) receive any notification about patch 2/3 and thought
I'd test what would happen without it, and results are not good.
I get:
gpio gpiochip5: (sx1502q): could not create pin range
So, I guess if 3/3 is going to stable, all three patches should go
there.
Cheers,
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-18 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-16 21:47 [REGRESSION] mux/gpio.c is not able to get any gpio pins Peter Rosin
2018-01-16 23:18 ` Linus Walleij
2018-01-16 23:57 ` Peter Rosin
2018-01-17 9:35 ` Linus Walleij
2018-01-17 10:39 ` Peter Rosin
2018-01-17 13:27 ` Linus Walleij
2018-01-17 13:34 ` [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: sx150x: fixes for the probe Peter Rosin
2018-01-17 13:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: sx150x: unregister the pinctrl on release Peter Rosin
2018-01-18 7:53 ` Linus Walleij
2018-01-17 13:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: sx150x: register pinctrl before adding the gpiochip Peter Rosin
2018-01-17 13:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: sx150x: add a static gpio/pinctrl pin range mapping Peter Rosin
2018-01-17 15:05 ` Andrew Jeffery
2018-01-17 15:27 ` Peter Rosin
2018-01-18 7:58 ` Linus Walleij
2018-01-18 8:19 ` Peter Rosin [this message]
2018-01-18 10:03 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=292ad461-1976-84dc-6f08-92bb643bbfd3@axentia.se \
--to=peda@axentia.se \
--cc=andrew@aj.id.au \
--cc=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.