From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932106AbWG0LoU (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:44:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932116AbWG0LoU (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:44:20 -0400 Received: from vsmtp1.tin.it ([212.216.176.141]:46746 "EHLO vsmtp1.tin.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932106AbWG0LoT (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:44:19 -0400 Message-ID: <2942.192.167.206.189.1154000633.squirrel@darkstar.linuxpratico.net> In-Reply-To: <20060727113506.GL23701@stusta.de> References: <20060726145019.GF23701@stusta.de> <20060726160604.GO32243@opteron.random> <20060726170236.GD31172@fieldses.org> <20060726172029.GS32243@opteron.random> <20060726205022.GI23701@stusta.de> <20060726211741.GU32243@opteron.random> <20060727065603.GJ23701@stusta.de> <4284.192.167.206.189.1153989192.squirrel@darkstar.linuxpratico.net> <20060727100446.GK23701@stusta.de> <2870.192.167.206.189.1153998447.squirrel@darkstar.linuxpratico.net> <20060727113506.GL23701@stusta.de> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:43:53 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion From: "Luigi Genoni" To: "Adrian Bunk" Cc: "Luigi Genoni" , andrea@cpushare.com, "J. Bruce Fields" , "Hans Reiser" , "Nikita Danilov" , "Rene Rebe" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 [CVS] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I answered a mail about how klive data should not be took in account, and could even be dangerous... On Thu, July 27, 2006 13:35, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 01:07:27PM +0200, Luigi Genoni wrote: > > >> Still I am missing something. >> >> >> I am not interested in discussing about 1:5 ora 5:1 or so on. >> I am not even interested if reiser4 users are 35 or 35000. >> But if some people felt they need reiser4 to get their work done, that >> means something. The numbers and the datum per se are meaningless. ... >> > > You answered to an email where I talked about the wrong assumption the > klive data could support the 1:5 market share claim. > > This is completely independent from discussions about why users might > need reiser4, or which technical or social problems prevent its merging > (unless of course someone wants to justify its merging wrongly with the > 1:5 claim), and therefore your answer does not apply to this part of > the thread. > > cu Adrian > > > -- > > > "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out > of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," > Lao Er said. > Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed > > >