From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [FOR DISCUSSION 0/9] Dove PMU support Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 13:47:19 +0100 Message-ID: <2953786.DBeOKcOQ8q@wuerfel> References: <20150312183020.GU8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <3456973.vXF9zkXSFZ@wuerfel> <20150313123211.GG8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150313123211.GG8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Andrew Lunn , Jason Cooper , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Pawel Moll , Len Brown , Ian Campbell , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Kumar Gala , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Friday 13 March 2015 12:32:11 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 01:26:17PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Friday 13 March 2015 12:11:27 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > Of course, I also have a patch which adds legacy support to > > > arch/arm/mach-dove, but I've assumed you're not interested in that... > > > > You mean legacy support in mach-mvebu? > > No. > > As you'll see, this uses a platform device notifier to hook the devices > onto the appropriate PM domain, which is why the driver needs to be > registered early. This also gets used in DT mode with one legacy > platform device which is dynamically registered (something which can't > happen with DT.) Ok, got it. I think that's fine too. If this helps you spend less time on forward-porting your patches and in turn completing the full dove support with DT faster, I'm all for merging this one too. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 13:47:19 +0100 Subject: [FOR DISCUSSION 0/9] Dove PMU support In-Reply-To: <20150313123211.GG8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20150312183020.GU8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <3456973.vXF9zkXSFZ@wuerfel> <20150313123211.GG8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <2953786.DBeOKcOQ8q@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 13 March 2015 12:32:11 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 01:26:17PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Friday 13 March 2015 12:11:27 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > Of course, I also have a patch which adds legacy support to > > > arch/arm/mach-dove, but I've assumed you're not interested in that... > > > > You mean legacy support in mach-mvebu? > > No. > > As you'll see, this uses a platform device notifier to hook the devices > onto the appropriate PM domain, which is why the driver needs to be > registered early. This also gets used in DT mode with one legacy > platform device which is dynamically registered (something which can't > happen with DT.) Ok, got it. I think that's fine too. If this helps you spend less time on forward-porting your patches and in turn completing the full dove support with DT faster, I'm all for merging this one too. Arnd